179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] Indie Ethics

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
2003-03-12 19:11John Reading RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
├─ 2003-03-12 19:18pixilated RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
└─ 2003-03-12 19:35Josh Steiner Re: [idm] Indie Ethics
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2003-03-12 19:11John Reading> -----Original Message----- > From: pixilated [mailto:pixilated@Alum.Dartmouth.ORG] The >
From:
John Reading
To:
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:11:03 -0500
Subject:
RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
permalink · <5C7C936BF3522E448C5F0A0BF6E300C5EFCCE9@usispex00001.na.didata.local>
quoted 2 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message----- > From: pixilated [mailto:pixilated@Alum.Dartmouth.ORG]
The
quoted 3 lines legitimacy of the present copyright structure is integral to the issue> legitimacy of the present copyright structure is integral to the issue > of whether it's okay to download music for free or not. >
BOLLOCKS. Has absolutely nothing to do with it at all. Finally cut through that sophistry to your point and voila! It's wrong. slave to the beat --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-03-12 19:18pixilatedUh, how am I wrong? Because you said so? -----Original Message----- From: John Reading [ma
From:
pixilated
To:
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:18:23 -0500
Subject:
RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
Reply to:
RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
permalink · <01ac01c2e8cc$26bf5140$f74eaa81@pocketfig>
Uh, how am I wrong? Because you said so? -----Original Message----- From: John Reading [mailto:john.reading@us.didata.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:11 PM To: idm@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
quoted 2 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message----- > From: pixilated [mailto:pixilated@Alum.Dartmouth.ORG]
The
quoted 1 line legitimacy of the present copyright structure is integral to the issue> legitimacy of the present copyright structure is integral to the issue
quoted 2 lines of whether it's okay to download music for free or not.> of whether it's okay to download music for free or not. >
BOLLOCKS. Has absolutely nothing to do with it at all. Finally cut through that sophistry to your point and voila! It's wrong. slave to the beat --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-03-12 19:35Josh Steinerwait, you seriously think that understanding the roots and meanings of copyright law has *
From:
Josh Steiner
To:
John Reading
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:35:06 -0800
Subject:
Re: [idm] Indie Ethics
Reply to:
RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
permalink · <3E6F8BEA.4010908@eds.org>
wait, you seriously think that understanding the roots and meanings of copyright law has *nothing* to do with a discussion on the legality/morality of mp3 sharing? that's a rather... um... unique position. John Reading wrote:
quoted 26 lines -----Original Message----->>-----Original Message----- >>From: pixilated [mailto:pixilated@Alum.Dartmouth.ORG] >> >> > >The > > >>legitimacy of the present copyright structure is integral to the issue >>of whether it's okay to download music for free or not. >> >> >> > >BOLLOCKS. Has absolutely nothing to do with it at all. Finally cut >through that sophistry to your point and voila! It's wrong. > > >slave to the beat > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
-- ____________________________________________________ independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org