179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] xmradio ( or, death of the music industry Part 2)

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2003-01-22 15:00Peter Becker [idm] xmradio ( or, death of the music industry Part 2)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2003-01-22 15:00Peter BeckerI managed to stay out of the last thread on the death of the music biz ( it won't -die- bt
From:
Peter Becker
To:
Cc:
StaticBeats , Albers, Brian , Peter Redkin
Date:
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:00:13 -0500
Subject:
[idm] xmradio ( or, death of the music industry Part 2)
permalink · <200301221455.h0MEtBUK010476@nycsmtp2out.rdc-nyc.rr.com>
I managed to stay out of the last thread on the death of the music biz ( it won't -die- btw, it will just change ) but couldn't resist the xm radio discussion. Suprised that XM doesn't give a shit about idm? Look at idms' marketshare. Consider a few things as background: 1. Primary investors ( amongst others): AEA Investors- founded by the Rockefeller, Harriman, and Mellon industrial families( I'll stop there..) Clear Channel ( lets all remember Clear Channels' position re: "appropriate" music right after 9/11) , and GM (who, amongst other things, are busy fulfilling a lot of defense contracts right now). 2. The director of programming, Lee Abrams, -literally- INVENTED the fm radio format. So now, given the position he's in, how different could xm be? How much more progressive? If it ain't broke, don't fix it, right? Keep the fm model but change the hardware. Not a very imaginative biz model. 3. Back to marketshare.....props to Brian who sent them idm show demos to the programming honchos at XM, but idm? Considering that we have 1000 subbers or more on this list, what does that represent in proportion to the subbers to xm ? I would guess a percentage of a percent. Now, when Brittney ( or perhaps Kenny G or maybe BB King or The Dixie Chicks or Creed ) go for that Proem remix, things might change. This is very unlikely as long as idm is a smaller genre then say, nu-punk. 4. Consider that even though xm offers the stand alone units for the home ( I don't know how successful that has been, maybe maybe not...) , that the majority of folks that use the service are car drivers. Whats the demographic of car drivers that have xm that even listen or care about electronic music? Perhaps those that tuned into the electronic channels and found that DJ Rap show are hearing that kind of music for the first time. But idm? The people that sub to xm and want electronic music want Moby, bad club trance, maybe Air at best. Don't assume that the mainstream has taste BECAUSE THEY DON'T!!! Mainly its about exposure? So.....if that optimistic indie idm programmer could just get his mix to the right person, maybe they'd take a chance on it? which leads to- 5. Consider the retail and promotional tie ins. One of the ways that XM gets paid is through promotional revenues worked with the stores- major retail chains and e-tailers. So, lets say you finally get that vinyl only idm track up on XM, or that track made on a CDR label, or even a Warp or a Ninja Tune track, how likely would it be that XM could possibly work it into a retail tie in? Answer: quite unlikely. When Sire did the Warp deal, mind you that Aphex and Autechre -did indeed- get into major chains, but that the majority of this went back as a loss. They overbought because they were strongarmed to do the deal. Same thing would happen with an XM/Best Buy deal ( fill in the blank of your favorite chain store..) . XM radio- "beyond am, beyond fm" But still not "beyond" enough that they didn't get past replacing the "a" or the "f" with an "X". Peter np: Rapoon- Fires of the Borderlands --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org