179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] [not]idm

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2003-01-04 08:38¿[phÿlûm]_siñt£r. [idm] [not]idm
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2003-01-04 08:38¿[phÿlûm]_siñt£r.i think the lines have blurred enough now for me that i can no longer discern what is and
From:
¿[phÿlûm]_siñt£r.
To:
Date:
Sat, 04 Jan 2003 03:38:02 -0500
Subject:
[idm] [not]idm
permalink · <005f01c2b3cc$984c4230$0300a8c0@phylumlaptop>
i think the lines have blurred enough now for me that i can no longer discern what is and is not idm. it seems that the constant categorization of new sounds is counter productive to the listener -- is it minimal idm, chip house or glitch hop? someone suggested in the braindance=idm thread that 'electronica' is more appropriate... and i'm beginning to agree. the set limits of idm [from, lets say, the artificial intelligence release to everything those bands put out for the next year] have been stomped into a smelly grey pudding, and i think it's time for someone to spell it out. let's see some EMPIRICAL LISTS - what makes it "idm" as opposed to "cut-core". maybe i made that one up. not for long i'm sure. charcoal for all, flames a plenty. /_/.-_/.|,\_\_.-\_-\ |¿[phÿlûm]_siñt£r| \_\.-_\.|,/_/_.-/_-/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org