179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] Re: Ae

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
2002-07-24 16:28Re: [idm] Re: Ae
└─ 2002-07-24 19:01Matthew Ross Davis Re: [idm] Re: Ae
└─ 2002-07-24 19:36EggyToast Re: [idm] Re: Ae
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2002-07-24 16:28Syntax8rror@aol.comDans un courrier daté du 23/07/02 10:55:04 Paris, Madrid (heure d'été), forcasa@yahoo.com
From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:28:57 EDT
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: Ae
permalink · <70.2021205c.2a702fc9@aol.com>
Dans un courrier daté du 23/07/02 10:55:04 Paris, Madrid (heure d'été), forcasa@yahoo.com a écrit :
quoted 1 line Without becoming too philosophical, what is there to "get?" I've listened> Without becoming too philosophical, what is there to "get?" I've listened
to
quoted 2 lines music as long as I can remember, but I can't figure out what there is to "> music as long as I can remember, but I can't figure out what there is to " > get."
quoted 2 lines I just don't get the same emotional> I just don't get the same emotional > feeling from Confield as I do from Tri Repetae.
u answered your own question :) /yann aka no_id --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-24 19:01Matthew Ross DavisWhy should music require something inherent to "get" in the first place? m......... craque
From:
Matthew Ross Davis
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:01:38 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: Ae
Reply to:
Re: [idm] Re: Ae
permalink · <B96463C2.2EDA%regis@sounding.com>
Why should music require something inherent to "get" in the first place? m......... craque.net On 7/24/02 11:28 AM, "Syntax8rror@aol.com" <Syntax8rror@aol.com> wrote:
quoted 19 lines Dans un courrier daté du 23/07/02 10:55:04 Paris, Madrid (heure d'été),> Dans un courrier daté du 23/07/02 10:55:04 Paris, Madrid (heure d'été), > forcasa@yahoo.com a écrit : > >> Without becoming too philosophical, what is there to "get?" I've listened > to >> music as long as I can remember, but I can't figure out what there is to " >> get." > >> I just don't get the same emotional >> feeling from Confield as I do from Tri Repetae. > > u answered your own question :) > > /yann aka no_id > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-24 19:36EggyToastAt 02:01 PM 7/24/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Why should music require something inherent to "g
From:
EggyToast
To:
Date:
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:36:52 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: Ae
Reply to:
Re: [idm] Re: Ae
permalink · <5.1.0.14.2.20020724143200.00b72808@mail.eggytoast.com>
At 02:01 PM 7/24/2002 -0500, you wrote:
quoted 1 line Why should music require something inherent to "get" in the first place?>Why should music require something inherent to "get" in the first place?
I agree to a point. Nearly all of the music I like I listened to and found *something* I liked on the first listen. Sometimes it took a while to really get into it, but there was nearly always something that stood out to me. Whether it be a particular sound, an overall vibe, or whatever. Oddly enough, the stuff I didn't really "get" on the first listen was always leaning more towards the simple side, rather than the complex side. For example, when I first listened to "music has the right to children," I thought "what's the big deal?" I thought it was sort of boring and I "didn't get it." I listened to it about a month later and realized that I really dug it. So usually it's the stuff that's beguiling simple, rather than technically complex, that takes me a while to "get." Perhaps I'm jaded by listening to more "complex" music in the first place :D Or maybe music that devotes so much energy to being technically complex should rather devote energy to being "good." derek ------- eggytoast.com ------- with lather thingy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org