179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] The next phase

10 messages · 5 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
2002-07-03 15:00Jason Stickel Re: [idm] The next phase
└─ 2002-07-03 16:09Mxyzptlk Re: [idm] The next phase
2002-07-03 15:14Jason Stickel Re: [idm] The next phase
2002-07-03 15:53Mxyzptlk [idm] The next phase
2002-07-03 16:03donna summer Re: [idm] The next phase
└─ 2002-07-03 17:17Mxyzptlk Re: [idm] The next phase
└─ 2002-07-03 20:50Thomas Millar Re: [idm] The next phase
└─ 2002-07-03 22:10Brian Redfern Re: [idm] The next phase
└─ 2002-07-03 22:35Thomas Millar Re: [idm] The next phase
└─ 2002-07-03 23:55Brian Redfern Re: [idm] The next phase
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2002-07-03 15:00Jason StickelJust the latest evidence of the communist regime strengthening their stranglehold on the m
From:
Jason Stickel
To:
,
Cc:
, , ,
Date:
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:00:16 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] The next phase
permalink · <F73REZTBqmD9TgDW44800005460@hotmail.com>
Just the latest evidence of the communist regime strengthening their stranglehold on the music industry...and to think that the thing that got me hooked on beats at an early age was the *freedom* of it all... JS
quoted 15 lines From: Mxyzptlk <jpklein@telocity.com>>From: Mxyzptlk <jpklein@telocity.com> >To: idm@hyperreal.org >CC: idm-m <idm-m@yahoogroups.com>,ambient@hyperreal.org, samba Marie's >Litany <dirtylist@lists.underworld.net>,313@hyperreal.org >Subject: [idm] The next phase >Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:53:56 -0500 > >http://www.msnbc.com/news/775684.asp?cp1=1 > > jeff > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
_________________________________________________________________ Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-03 16:09MxyzptlkAt 10:00 AM 7/3/2002, Jason Stickel wrote: >Just the latest evidence of the communist regi
From:
Mxyzptlk
To:
Date:
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:09:57 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] The next phase
Reply to:
Re: [idm] The next phase
permalink · <5.1.0.14.2.20020703110722.02477110@pop3.norton.antivirus>
At 10:00 AM 7/3/2002, Jason Stickel wrote:
quoted 5 lines Just the latest evidence of the communist regime strengthening their>Just the latest evidence of the communist regime strengthening their >stranglehold on the music industry...and to think that the thing that got >me hooked on beats at an early age was the *freedom* of it all... > >JS
Communism? Nah - more like a weird Fascism inspired by the bottom line in capitalism. I wouldn't feel so bad about it if the RIAA was actually putting money into the *artists'* pockets. jeff
quoted 3 lines >>http://www.msnbc.com/news/775684.asp?cp1=1 >> >> jeff
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-03 15:14Jason StickelAgreed...I have my own personal issues (like most of us) pertaining to artist rights and t
From:
Jason Stickel
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:14:06 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] The next phase
permalink · <F74CHi4ztwrVPFyarvG0000544d@hotmail.com>
Agreed...I have my own personal issues (like most of us) pertaining to artist rights and the like, but for the sake of musicians in the genres we all hold in high regard I think the issue may impact us differently. Many digital/experimental artists, as we have noted, are all for getting the music out there in any manner necessary. It's not like we are bootlegging Madonna tracks and she's unable to feed her kids as a result......the whole point being exactly what Jeff says - the artists aren't even seeing royalties from all of this. After looking into the issue, doing my homework, reading the (supposed) pros and cons, and debating this heavily with various parties, I still see no merit as to how the RIAA can support the argument that they have rights to any proceeds in this whole elaborate scam. Just my rants...sorry. JS
quoted 31 lines From: Mxyzptlk <jpklein@telocity.com>>From: Mxyzptlk <jpklein@telocity.com> >To: idm@hyperreal.org >Subject: Re: [idm] The next phase >Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:09:57 -0500 > >At 10:00 AM 7/3/2002, Jason Stickel wrote: >>Just the latest evidence of the communist regime strengthening their >>stranglehold on the music industry...and to think that the thing that got >>me hooked on beats at an early age was the *freedom* of it all... >> >>JS > >Communism? Nah - more like a weird Fascism inspired by the bottom line in >capitalism. >I wouldn't feel so bad about it if the RIAA was actually putting money into >the *artists'* pockets. > > jeff > > > > >>>http://www.msnbc.com/news/775684.asp?cp1=1 >>> >>> jeff > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
_________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-03 15:53Mxyzptlkhttp://www.msnbc.com/news/775684.asp?cp1=1 jeff ------------------------------------------
From:
Mxyzptlk
To:
Cc:
idm-m , , samba Marie's Litany ,
Date:
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:53:56 -0500
Subject:
[idm] The next phase
permalink · <5.1.0.14.2.20020703105213.0247b880@pop3.norton.antivirus>
http://www.msnbc.com/news/775684.asp?cp1=1 jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-03 16:03donna summerI've already seen a few newpaper articles mentioning a public backlash, hopefully this out
From:
donna summer
To:
, ,
Date:
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:03:01 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] The next phase
permalink · <F258wPxCNoT4orHjJqa00006085@hotmail.com>
I've already seen a few newpaper articles mentioning a public backlash, hopefully this outragious corporate bullshit will stop because of their own naked greed. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-03 17:17MxyzptlkAt 11:03 AM 7/3/2002, you wrote: >I've already seen a few newpaper articles mentioning a p
From:
Mxyzptlk
To:
donna summer
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:17:25 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] The next phase
Reply to:
Re: [idm] The next phase
permalink · <5.1.0.14.2.20020703121051.0247a700@pop3.norton.antivirus>
At 11:03 AM 7/3/2002, you wrote:
quoted 3 lines I've already seen a few newpaper articles mentioning a public backlash,>I've already seen a few newpaper articles mentioning a public backlash, >hopefully this outragious corporate bullshit will stop because of their >own naked greed.
One would hope so - although I fear corporate greed may possibly be matched by public listlessness/paralysis/apathy. Unless people are quite inconvenienced (often financially), it is too much work to think in terms of "communities" vs. the already overemphasized wants of the individual. Unless the injustice has a price tag AND it is camped out on the front lawn of the person in question, nobody wants to be bothered. Revolution has no place in the Franklin Planner. jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-03 20:50Thomas MillarJS: >> I've already seen a few newpaper articles mentioning a public backlash, >> hopefull
From:
Thomas Millar
To:
Date:
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 16:50:28 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] The next phase
Reply to:
Re: [idm] The next phase
permalink · <B948DBD3.233%tmillar@comcast.net>
JS:
quoted 3 lines I've already seen a few newpaper articles mentioning a public backlash,>> I've already seen a few newpaper articles mentioning a public backlash, >> hopefully this outragious corporate bullshit will stop because of their >> own naked greed.
Ooh, a public backlash. Yes, I just saw a gang of fileshare addicts out there on the street throwing bricks through the windows of a Clear Channel-owned radio station. Indeed. Backlash. As in 'I JUST WROTE AN EMAIL TO JACK VALENTI MAN AND IT WAS IN ALL CAPS HES GONNA BE SORRY NOW'. JPK:
quoted 1 line bothered. Revolution has no place in the Franklin Planner.> bothered. Revolution has no place in the Franklin Planner.
I don't know if KaZaA/Napster/Morpheus ever counted as 'Revolutionary'. It's just tape trading at the speed of light. Revolutionary would be the return of live music as a primary means of income instead of musicians relying on the sales of recordings. And enough people going to shows (other than the megafestivals) to make this truly possible. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-03 22:10Brian RedfernGood luck, clear channel also ownws most cencert venues, and these days so much un - venue
From:
Brian Redfern
To:
Thomas Millar
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] The next phase
Reply to:
Re: [idm] The next phase
permalink · <Pine.GSO.4.21.0207031509530.26493-100000@muse.calarts.edu>
Good luck, clear channel also ownws most cencert venues, and these days so much un - venued music is basically illegal. The best thing to do is play for free, give away mp3s for free and then sell t shirts, vinyl records and tapes. On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Thomas Millar wrote:
quoted 28 lines JS:> JS: > >> I've already seen a few newpaper articles mentioning a public backlash, > >> hopefully this outragious corporate bullshit will stop because of their > >> own naked greed. > > Ooh, a public backlash. Yes, I just saw a gang of fileshare addicts out > there on the street throwing bricks through the windows of a Clear > Channel-owned radio station. Indeed. Backlash. As in 'I JUST WROTE AN EMAIL > TO JACK VALENTI MAN AND IT WAS IN ALL CAPS HES GONNA BE SORRY NOW'. > > JPK: > > bothered. Revolution has no place in the Franklin Planner. > > I don't know if KaZaA/Napster/Morpheus ever counted as 'Revolutionary'. It's > just tape trading at the speed of light. > > Revolutionary would be the return of live music as a primary means of income > instead of musicians relying on the sales of recordings. And enough people > going to shows (other than the megafestivals) to make this truly possible. > > Tom > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-03 22:35Thomas Millaron 7/3/02 6:10 PM, Brian Redfern at bredfern@calarts.edu wrote: > Good luck, clear channel
From:
Thomas Millar
To:
Date:
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 18:35:21 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] The next phase
Reply to:
Re: [idm] The next phase
permalink · <B948F468.23D%tmillar@comcast.net>
on 7/3/02 6:10 PM, Brian Redfern at bredfern@calarts.edu wrote:
quoted 4 lines Good luck, clear channel also ownws most cencert venues, and these days so> Good luck, clear channel also ownws most cencert venues, and these days so > much un - venued music is basically illegal. The best thing to do is play > for free, give away mp3s for free and then sell t shirts, vinyl records > and tapes.
Clear Channel owns the predominant concert promotion network in the States, and they use their radio clout to force major labels to use them. Said labels and their artists get what they deserve AFAI'mC. Clear Channel does not own any venues as far as I know. I'm not talking about playing stadiums or parks, anyway. DJs can make a good living touring the world playing (other people's records) at clubs owned by independent operators and promoted by similar independent operators. Several live bands have done as well, playing smaller venues and independent festivals year-round. I don't think 'luck' is the word you're looking for. More like a little talent and some hard work. The business model for live music is as valid now as it was a century ago. Tom P.S. What is un-venued music? Busking? Maybe that's illegal in NYC now, certainly not the rest of the world. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2002-07-03 23:55Brian RedfernYeah, it is hard work to tour, but there's a reason that even Led Zepplin used to take Maf
From:
Brian Redfern
To:
Thomas Millar
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 16:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] The next phase
Reply to:
Re: [idm] The next phase
permalink · <Pine.GSO.4.21.0207031644540.6285-100000@muse.calarts.edu>
Yeah, it is hard work to tour, but there's a reason that even Led Zepplin used to take Mafia type thugs with them, its always been hard to make sure you get paid. The most successful business model I've seen is to become an independent promoter/dj/producer, basically thow your own underground shows, dj the records and produce, with basically a small crew taking the place of the band of old. But I'm an old guy, I've been doing live music since 1988, and I have lots of friends who've done live music since 1928 (real old dudes), its not easy to get paid. But I also do know people who do it for a living. Basically I do music for love and give it away for free with an electronic frontier foundation open license, done in the mod file format so the tracks are easy for others to remix. True, there is a potential to make good money playing live music, but I think first it starts with loving music, cause that will keep you doing music and being a cool, creative person for life, which is really more important than stardom. It does take hard work, though, and in some places the underground is in better shape than others, so seeking a liberal place to live is a good idea, cause your location does make a difference. Most of my friends who do music for a living moved to NYC to get into the commercial music scene. I have friends who are in Macy Gray's backing group, so I do know lots of people who do music for a living. But its not easy, and the consolidation of the music industry has made things harder. But then again its all about hitting a certain sweet spot. However like I said, I make a living as a database programmer, and its much easier than being on tour 50 weeks/year. However I wouldn'd have learned computers without first getting into Mac sequencing software in my old school's music dept. Music just has waaay more value to your life than to even worry about being a pro. Music is a spritual communication with the creative forces of the universe, like Sun Ra once said that when we die, God will play back all the music we made in life and see if its good enough to get us into heaven. On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Thomas Millar wrote:
quoted 34 lines on 7/3/02 6:10 PM, Brian Redfern at bredfern@calarts.edu wrote:> on 7/3/02 6:10 PM, Brian Redfern at bredfern@calarts.edu wrote: > > > Good luck, clear channel also ownws most cencert venues, and these days so > > much un - venued music is basically illegal. The best thing to do is play > > for free, give away mp3s for free and then sell t shirts, vinyl records > > and tapes. > > Clear Channel owns the predominant concert promotion network in the States, > and they use their radio clout to force major labels to use them. Said > labels and their artists get what they deserve AFAI'mC. > > Clear Channel does not own any venues as far as I know. > I'm not talking about playing stadiums or parks, anyway. > > DJs can make a good living touring the world playing (other people's > records) at clubs owned by independent operators and promoted by similar > independent operators. Several live bands have done as well, playing smaller > venues and independent festivals year-round. > > I don't think 'luck' is the word you're looking for. More like a little > talent and some hard work. The business model for live music is as valid now > as it was a century ago. > > Tom > > P.S. What is un-venued music? Busking? Maybe that's illegal in NYC now, > certainly not the rest of the world. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org