179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] Death to WebRadio: proposed webcast reporting rules and more (fwd)

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2002-02-22 04:09Ethan Clauset [idm] Death to WebRadio: proposed webcast reporting rules and more (fwd)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2002-02-22 04:09Ethan Clausetsorry if I forwarded twice.. please direct all complaints about this nonsense to the appro
From:
Ethan Clauset
To:
Date:
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:09:41 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
[idm] Death to WebRadio: proposed webcast reporting rules and more (fwd)
permalink · <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202212308351.17277-100000@benjamin.webslingerZ.com>
sorry if I forwarded twice.. please direct all complaints about this nonsense to the appropriate office(s). ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:23:58 -0500 (EST) From: Paul Jones Subject: Death to WebRadio: proposed webcast reporting rules and more http://www.radiohorizon.com/index.php3?fcn=displayarticle&id=2424 Broadcasters Outraged over Proposed Reporting Rules Tuesday February 19, 2002 The Copyright Office has published its notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the recordkeeping and reporting standards around streaming and internet radio initiatives. Broadcasters, to say the least, are stunned as the Copyright Office followed almost to the letter the RIAA's wish list. Under the proposed rules radio stations, internet stations, and satellite companies would have to report the following information about every streamed program: A) The name of the service B) The channel of the program (AM/FM stations use station id) C) The type of program (Archived/Looped/Live) D) Date of Transmission E) Time of Transmission F) Time zone of origination of Transmission G) Numeric designation of the place of the sound recording within the program H) Duration of transmission (to nearest second) I) Sound Recording Title J) The ISRC code of the recording K) The release year of the album per copyright notice and in the case of compilation albums, the release year of the album and copyright date of the track L) Featured recording artist M) Retail album title N) The recording Label O) The UPC code of the retail album P) The catalog number Q) The copyright owner information R) The musical genre of the channel or program (station format) And a listener's log listing: 1) The name of the service or entity 2) The channel or program 3) the date and time that the user logged in (the user's timezone) 4) the date and time that the user logged out (the user's timezone) 5) The time zone where the signal was received (user) 6) Unique User identifier 7) The country in which the user received the transmissions All of this information and more would be required to be in a specific data file format and reported. Broadcasters are outraged because this would be a tremendous burden and involves collecting information that they just don't have. The RIAA states that the information is easily obtainable and that they have several licensees currently reporting this level of information. Comments on the proposed rules are due by March 11. http://www.kurthanson.com/index.asp CARP, the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel, which is the body appointed to recommend a copyright royalty rate for music streamed on the Internet, has finally released their conclusions. These <http://www.kurthanson.com/images/logos/USCopyrightOffice-logo_hor.gif> rates, if adopted by the Copyright Office, will be what webcasters will have to pay (according to the Statuatory License) to record labels to use their music. The table below was taken from the U.S. Copyright Office site here, and lists the basic fees. Unfortunately, there is very little by way of explanation of the terms. Look for that in the second part of the CARP findings (RAIN hears that the "Schedule B" release will come on Monday). It appears that commercial braodcasters, to stream their over-the-air signal on the Internet, will pay a royalty at about half the rate (0.07 cents) of an Internet "pure-play" webcaster (0.14 cents). In other words, Spinner.com will pay at double the rate of WLUP-FM/Chicago. But the table leads to some confusion here: To what does entry 1.(a) refer? We're unclear as well as to what "Business Establishment Service" is. Note that "per performance" means "per song/per listener." In other words, every time one person hears one song, that's a performance. If twelve people listen to your webcast of twelve songs, that's 144 performances (we'll do some more math later). "Ephemeral" recordings, you may remember, are backup or "cached" copies of the same song (used to facilitate streaming, etc.). We're assuming this nine percent pays for the right to use them. Note the minimum fee per license has been set at $500. [a very helpful table follows at the RAIN site. URL above. - p] For the Copyright Arbitration Panels (CARP) site http://www.loc.gov/copyright/carp/ http://www.loc.gov/copyright/carp/webcasting_rates.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org