179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] Here, about the best clubs in NY and how establishment killed it: Lunatarium stuff

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2002-02-06 17:41s r [idm] Here, about the best clubs in NY and how establishment killed it: Lunatarium stuff
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2002-02-06 17:41s r> Subject: [nyc-raves] Lunatarium stuff > > Lunatarium Lunacy: Why is the city's most > pr
From:
s r
To:
Date:
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
[idm] Here, about the best clubs in NY and how establishment killed it: Lunatarium stuff
permalink · <20020206174128.25540.qmail@web20101.mail.yahoo.com>
quoted 354 lines Subject: [nyc-raves] Lunatarium stuff> Subject: [nyc-raves] Lunatarium stuff > > Lunatarium Lunacy: Why is the city's most > promising independent venue closed? Will it be > back? > When? And if so, will it be any good? > > > The hardest thing about throwing events in New > York City is finding the space for them. That > means > the most successful independent > promoters are the ones who either have access > to > a regular venue, or the ones who can turn out > the rare > new space. > > While new clubs like Luxx, Northsix, and Warsaw > open all over Williamsburg and Greenpoint, > independents still have a hard time > finding venues, much less good ones. In the > past > year, the search for a regular space -- or even > large > rooms for one-off events -- has > led some groups into filthy basement > warehouses, > still-sweaty meat-packing plants, or big > buildings > with shady landlords. > > All of this is why the massive Dumbo space > known > as the Lunatarium seems so extraordinary. The > breathtaking 18,000 square-foot venue, > with its 30-foot ceilings and its perfect East > River skyline view, opened with two events in > July > 2001. Eventually it became a regular > weekend venue, and it was used by a small group > of Dumbo promoters working with independents > like > Blackkat, SEAL, and DJ Spooky. > > That was until three weeks ago, on January 11, > when a small fire started on the sixth floor of > the > building during an ambient party > called Airport. The fire department came, put > out the small trashcan blaze, and left. Two > hours > later, representatives from the New York > City Social Club Task Force arrived and started > writing violations. > > Several fines later -- for alcohol, for > dancing, > for occupancy -- the party was shut down. > (Irony > alert: Yes, fined for dancing at an > *ambient* event; apparently there were about 20 > people grooving to a > DJ spinning jungle in the small room, while > approximately 800 in the > main space were standing, sitting, and > talking.) > The Lunatarium is now closed and scheduled > events -- > except for a Run-DMC gig that > happened last week -- have been cancelled. Now > its bookers are scrambling to get the permits > they > need to open up again. It's not > an easy task, and it's not cheap either. > > ***** > > Back in July, the Lunatarium was a completely > raw space, all brick columns and shoddy > electricity, > nine floors up and served by a > large, temperamental freight elevator. It had > hosted an art show, but it was mostly being > used for > storage. > > It was first rented for parties by two groups, > including Complacent.org and a small group of > promoters who had been throwing > regular parties in their Dumbo lofts. That > second group, Dumboluna (after the name of > their first > event in the Lunatarium) now includes > Sebastian Holzmeister, Mark Winkel, and Carlos > Granda. > > Dumboluna worked out a deal with the landlord > of > the Lunatarium and began to have regular > parties in > the space. > Eventually, they got the landlord to agree to > rent it > to them for a month at a time and they > began booking events. They would either put > together their own line-ups of DJs and artists, > or > they would let a group come in and > take over the space for a night. Sometimes they > did "co-productions," which were often > essentially > the same thing as letting a group come in and > take > over the space -- or at least the > creative aspect of it. > > All of this was being done on the down low. > There were permits for wine and beer, and some > for > assembly, but the place was far from > legal; they didn't have the rare New York > cabaret permit that allows dancing, for > instance. > > Mark Winkel says that this wasn't by design. > "The only reason we were throwing the outlaws > was > because none of us had money. We were > trying to get the money to be legit," he says. > > To some extent, the space was working. By all > accounts, the New York Decompression party -- > thrown > by the group of New York Burning Man > aficionados who call themselves the Society for > Experimental Arts and Learning (SEAL) -- was a > massive > creative and commercial > success. It featured fire spinners, large-scale > inflatables, propane sculpture, bands, DJs, and > hundreds of costumed partygoers. > > Blackkat also threw successful events in the > space, including the carnival-themed Fabulon > and the > Mythos Halloween party. Both parties > made full use of the venue in a way that > couldn't happen in a club,bringing in large > metal > sculpture and rides, big games, and > pyrotechnic shows. > > Not all of the events worked. DJ Spooky booked > and performed at a string of Friday-night shows > that > had problems with sound and attendance, > especially at > the start. And Winkel says a show with DJ > Hell and the witchy string band Rasputina was a > near disaster. > > In general, though, things were going well. It > was, if nothing else, a venue -- an option. > Parties > like Airport, which was organized by > Shel Kimen to showcase ambient musicians and > cozy,conversation-oriented sculptural > environments, > were just beginning to hint at what could be > done with > the space. > > ***** > > Winkel thinks it will take about two months to > get the Lunatarium up and running again, but > his > estimate seems low. It's extremely > difficult to get the kinds of permits the > Lunatarium would require. > First, the building has to be brought up to > code. Then, Dumboluna > will have to obtain public assembly, liquor, > and > cabaret permits. > > (This article will skip over the larger issue > of > cabaret licenses > and how absurd it is that you need a permit for > people to dance. > There are far better, and more informative > articles gathered online at > www.nodancingallowed.com. > Suffice it to say that the entire issue > is absolutely crazy, and hanging together by a > racist, archaic law that was intended to keep > white > kids away from jazz.) > > Part of the difficulty is that the owner of a > space has to wade through several state and > city > organizations in order to get all the > right signatures. Adam Shore, who has worked > extensively on cabaret laws with an umbrella > anti-cabaret organization called Dance the > Vote, points out that to get a cabaret license, > you have to get the permit from the Department > of > Consumer Affairs, but it has to be > signed by Department of Buildings (where some > people have registered complaints), the Fire > Department, the Police Department, the State > Liquor Authority, and your community board. > > "Each one has very specific rules of what you > need, and each one keeps passing the buck until > you > get the other one," he says. The > process can take up to two years and cost > $100,000, he says. > > "It's not impossible," says Shore. "It's just > going to take a longtime, a lot of patience, > and it's > going to take money." > > ***** > > The Lunatarium closing has brought up another > question as well, and the one that everyone > with even > a tangential connection to the space > is talking about. The best thing about the > venue > is that so far its bookers have been remarkably > open > to the New York underground (a word you have to > use > here even if it makes you uncomfortable). The > question, then, is even if the space can get up > and running again, can it possibly maintain the > shambling aesthetic and the openness > that allowed flaming beds, trash sculptors, > relatively low prices, pyrotechnic shows, > dancing past > sunrise, and even a huge ambient-music event? > > Not everyone was happy with the old Lunatarium. > There were murmurs that Dumboluna was taking > too large > a cut from the door and the bar, or that they > weren't > following through with promises, or that they > were taking advantage of volunteer labor. Not > one critic was willing to talk for attribution > here, > but you could find public hints of this in > discussions > on the New York Burning Man listserve and in > other > online forums. > > (For the record, Cory Mervis, the executive > director of SEAL, says that Dumboluna played > fair. And > Jason Blackkat, of Blackkat, concurs, pointing > out > that Blackkat, after some negotiation, > eventually > worked out an equitable deal.) > > A constant issue, of course, is that there was > a > lot of money involved. Most of the parties were > drawing 800 to 1500 a night, says Winkel, and > one > thousand people at $10 a head adds up fast -- > even > faster when wine is selling at $4 a cup. > > But Winkel insists that no one at Dumboluna is > getting rich. Forstarters, the rent on the > space is > astronomical. > Winkel wouldn't say exactly how much the space > goes > for, but he said that it is"significantly more" > than > the rumored $20,000 a month. (The landlord > is letting Dumboluna slide while the space is > closed.) There are > also four-color flyers being printed, sound > systems, and a growing staff of professional > security > guards to take a cut. > > "I think that we've gotten some bad press from > what we've been doing," says Winkel. "Some > people > don't know what we're trying to do. But forget > about > the time or intention -- we have no money. I'm > eating peanut butter and jelly and grilled > cheese. When I hear us being demonized, when I > hear > how much money we're [supposedly] > making, it just hurts." > > One of the reasons Winkel is upset is that few > seem to understand exactly what Dumboluna is > trying to > do with the space. "Our goal is > really to make this an art space that has a > nightclub element of dancing," he says. "The > art > element is crucial. We've been featuring > local musical talent. It's nice to have big > names, but the idea is to showcase new talent, > to give > musicians and artists a place to > work." > > When the space is not being used for parties, > Dumboluna has provided a large space for fire > spinners > to practice, sets to be built, and > photos to be shot. Winkel wants to continue > these kind of things, eventually opening up for > lectures, workshops, art-making lessons, > and gallery space. Even so, the Lunatarium will > have > to make money, and most understand. "It's a > business," > says SEAL's Mervis. "As much as they > want to make it a community space, it isn't. If > they don't pay the rent they lose the space." > > And that's the problem. If Dumboluna can go > legit at all, can it go legit and be a > successful art > space at the same time? > > "I think they have some genuine interest in the > creative potential of the space," adds Jason > Blackkat. > "Hopefully there is some line > between being a commercial club and a raw > space. > It looked like they were getting there." > >
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org