179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] sum(i=1 to n, D.A.R.E.)

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2001-05-09 04:27Brian MacDonald [idm] sum(i=1 to n, D.A.R.E.)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2001-05-09 04:27Brian MacDonaldI can't believe I have to type this. Seriously though, I have a *lot* of issues with the s
From:
Brian MacDonald
To:
Date:
Tue, 8 May 2001 21:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
[idm] sum(i=1 to n, D.A.R.E.)
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010508205222.19146A-100000@falco.kuci.uci.edu>
I can't believe I have to type this. Seriously though, I have a *lot* of issues with the so-called war on drugs, and while I don't necessarily think it was initiated as any overtly racist/classist movement, it certainly has become that to some degree. It's destructive in all manners, and does the opposite of its so-called original goal. But the issue is the use of one's music in an ad that may be tangentially or more than tangetially tied to "the war on drugs". There are too many unknown variables involved to just easily pin RDJ as a supporter of the war on drugs. You just can't collapse an ominous pool of factors into one simple induction. First off, are we all certain RDJ approved this? There still are cases of sponsors that don't do rights checks or ask permission to use music in their spots before asking the artists in question. Hell, we like to argue. Let's just ASS-U-ME that RDJ knew about this.... Second, who *exactly* sponsored the ad? Was it D.A.R.E.? Was it something similar? I'm curious, because for all we know, the sponsors may not necessarily be the top-of-the-castle evil illuminati behind "the war on drugs". I'm in support of programs that will, say, keep elementary school kids away from drugs. In fact, in a perfect world, persuasion away from dangerous drugs (and I don't consider pot, certain psychedelics, alcohol, nicotine, and similarly potent drugs to be dangerous) for all of society is a beneficial thing, IMHO. The problem is the illegalization, simplicity of the message without some basic education, and the resulting societal taboo and accompanying prejudices thereof. Public service announcements telling people about the danger of certain drugs isn't necessarily contributing to the evil. I stress "necessarily". But hell, let's take it closer to the line. Suppose RDJ did get asked by Mr. War On Drugs, Inc. himself to get the rights to use some music for the ads, knowing full well that Mr. WOD is helping to put more unprivileged addicted blacks in prison. Hell, I'm taking it *to* the line. Let's say RDJ is friends with Mr. WOD, and has a working business relationship with him, and that he likes to crack (haw haw, fully intentional pun there) jokes about blacks in prison. Would that stop me from listening to and/or buying his music? I'd say, probably not. Yes, it's a lot harder to support an artist who you know is conspicuously closely knit to an institution you find offensive..or support an artist who you find has just plain offensive things to say. But what about the 90% of your spending money that supports equally evil things that you *don't* know about? You'd be a hypocrite if you said you'd stop listening to or buying RDJ for political reasons, while blindly spending your money at places that eventually trickle down or up to the same evil bastards you chastised RDJ over. Unless you lived an isolated anarcho-agricultural lifestyle. This may disappoint the hardcore on the list.. but I know that, personally, I'm not cut out for that. And I'm not about to try. The notion of boycotting an artist that gives a thumbs up to or gets solicited for work by organizations you find offensive is pretty silly anyway. Tell people about the injustices of the organizations in question. Not buying Stereolab records for selling songs to Verizon Wireless or Volkswagen does absolutely nothing for your fight against the latter two. (Assuming there is something to fight against them for)... "Exposing" RDJ -- assuming he even approved of the use of the track in the spot, and that he stands by the decision -- will similarly do nothing to stop the drug war. Continuing to buy RDJ material will similarly do nothing to support it. Again, assuming this was a conscious decision on his part...which most of us don't know yet. ======================================================================= Brian MacDonald <brianm@kuci.org> ======================================================================= --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org