On Mon, 7 May 2001, brian albers wrote:
quoted 7 lines I don't understand why people must insist on degrading everything out now,
> >I don't understand why people must insist on degrading everything out now,
> >cause it's not "innovative".
>
> Part of the problem is that there is just an overwhelming amount of cds and
> vinyl being released every week. I mean I read and value the reviews on the
> list, but if I actually tried to gather all the recordings that people spoke
> highly of I'd go insane, not to mention beyond flat broke.
Agreed but isn't that reviews are for? To help you pick out what you
want or can afford to buy? Heh, you're really screwed if you're into other genrese like
jazz/improv, dub, pop, indie rock, etc like me. ;) Speaking of other
genres:
quoted 6 lines Secondly, being "innovative" is very important because without innovation
> Secondly, being "innovative" is very important because without innovation
> any genre will shrivel up and die. At least lose interest for me. Look at
> reggae, blues, rock, metal, grunge. Nothing in those styles will ever
> inpress me ever again because those styles have developed conventions or
> "rules of the style" and they've all been done to death and there will never
> ever be anything "new" about them.
C'mon are you saying that IDM doesn't have conventions of it's own?
Like "slow ambient pads drift in, funky polyrthmic beat comes in , add 3
note melody on top, etc."? I'm not saying you _have_ to like other genres
but you shouldn't just write them off like that.
I mean, a few years after I got into IDM I realized that a lot of what I
like about it came from my grounding in prog rock and classic rock like
Yes, King Crimson, and The Who... and later Minimalist composers like
Steve Reich and Philip Glass. It sounds weird but I loved the tempo/time
changes,occassionally strange synth sounds and some of the virtuosic
aspects of prog rock and I really loved the minimalist repeating synth
pattern in The Who's "Baba O' Reiley". And um... I wouldn't have gotten
into Brian Eno if it weren't for U2. All of which added up to stuff like
Autechre, Apehx, and Mu-ziq... at least to me.
You listed reggae in your list of genres that don't have anything 'new'
about them. What about jungle? Reggae and dub are intimately intertwined
and jungle sure as hell wouldn't have arisen if it weren't for the
influence of Jamaican immigrants in the UK and the subsequent importation
of dub/reggae records and soundsystems. Then there's the Jamaican
dancehall influence on Timbaland who basically throws down IDMish
beats (funky but kinda arhythmic like on Alliyah's "Are You That
Somebody?") in a r'n'b/rap context.
I'm sorry if I come off like I'm just showing of my music knowledge
because that's NOT my intention. I'm just saying that it's a mistake to
consider IDM 'superior' to other genres because it's more 'innovative' or
that there aren't conventions/cliches for IDM.
quoted 5 lines The good thing about this argument for electronic music is that because thes
> The good thing about this argument for electronic music is that because thes
> sounds are largely a product of technology, it will evolve and progress as
> technology evolves and progresses. Do you think Richard Devine would be
> making music if all we had were DX7s and Linn sequencers? Born at the right
> time I guess.
I think that Devine would be making different sounding music. Hell, I think Devine
would be making music if we were in the stone ages and we just had rocks
to bang around. That being said I think that ALL music is largely a
product of technology.
The piano is an incredibly complex instrument that just happens to be made
out of wood and metal. It might sound cliched now due its
long history and years of media saturation but then in the 20th century
some weirdo (joking of course) named John Cage stuck things like
nails and screws inbetween the strings to create different sounds. Not to
mention Conlon Nannacarrow using banks of player pianos to create these
fucking outlandish sounds (imagine if Squarepusher were programming
the tempos of player pianos instead of drum machines/samplers).
quoted 3 lines Thirdly, I think it is just human nature that we more easily find words of
> Thirdly, I think it is just human nature that we more easily find words of
> criticism than words of praise. Why this is I don't know, but I know I'm
> guilty of it myself.
Heh. I guess I'm guilty as well with my response to you. Again, I'm not
tyring to show off or rip you. I just want to say that you might find
elements of IDM that you like in different music and vice-versa if you
opened your ears a little bit.
quoted 5 lines To demonstrate this, I'll mention that I'm liking the Confield less and less
> To demonstrate this, I'll mention that I'm liking the Confield less and less
> upon repeated listenings. The constantly shifting meters and tempoes
> (tempi?) detract from the album's appeal. Other artists in a similar vein
> that I'm more likely to listen to would be OST, Magnetophone or maybe even
> Phthalocyanine.
Well, that's ok. Wish I had Confield so I could add to this but what is it
about OST,Magnetophone, or Phtalocyanine that you like? Out of curiousity
that is...
thanks for yer time,
Howard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org