There's a difference between murdering someone intentionally, and being a
jackass who drinks and does drugs and kills someone "accidentaly". You
murder someone, you forfeit the right to live, you trade in your life for
taking a life. You unintentionally kill someone, you pay a fine or do time,
pay for your stupid mistake. <Dripping with annoyance toward inability to
understand common sense...>
In a message dated 2/13/01 7:08:40 PM Central Standard Time, sanvara@home.com
writes:
quoted 22 lines From: <LOWONICE13@aol.com>
> From: <LOWONICE13@aol.com>
> To: <idm@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [idm] napster, now death penalty
>
>
> > > > Okay. The death penalty is flat out wrong....isntituing an action as
> > > punishment to rectify the same action is the classic conservative's
> > > head-in-the-ass manaeuver.
> >
> > listen stupid, if you kill someone, you broke the rules of the game, and
> you
> > pay the price. Pretty simple.
>
> Ok lets also execute all the drunk and drug impaired drivers that kill
> people on the road too. They broke the same rules of the game. And if you
> cause an accident driving which causes an injury to someone that results in
> their arm being amputated you should have your own arm cut off as
> punishment. All this is so simple isn't it? <dripping with sarcasm...>
>
> How all this is related to Napster is beyond me.
>