179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] melody is rythm

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 2 days · search this subject
2001-01-27 20:44jon anderson [idm] melody is rythm
└─ 2001-01-28 08:00Matt U Re: [idm] melody is rythm
└─ 2001-01-30 00:12R. Lim Re: [idm] melody is rythm
2001-01-30 00:39Arnold Layne Re: [idm] melody is rythm
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2001-01-27 20:44jon andersonas a sidenote, when people talk about whether so-and-so is mostly rythm or mostly melody,
From:
jon anderson
To:
Date:
Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:44:56 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
[idm] melody is rythm
permalink · <20010127204456.723.qmail@web613.mail.yahoo.com>
as a sidenote, when people talk about whether so-and-so is mostly rythm or mostly melody, it can be said that all music is really only rythm. when a pulse becomes rapid enough, we begin to hear it as pitch, and instead of "bpm" we refer to "frequency". e.g., when you hear a pitch, you receive a rapid succession of "beats" (changes of air pressure) on your eardrum. i could imagine someone (like r. devine maybe) taking this idea and composing with bpm organizations (instead of pitch organizations). like, simultaneous beat collages being "chords", etc. then, if you speed the track up really really fast (imagine gradually spinning the vinyl faster and faster...) you begin to hear a melody. j __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-28 08:00Matt UWell yes, but ideally one would not have to spin the vinyl faster to hear this melody. The
From:
Matt U
To:
jon anderson ,
Date:
Sun, 28 Jan 2001 02:00:35 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] melody is rythm
Reply to:
[idm] melody is rythm
permalink · <457460313.20010128020035@mindspring.com>
Well yes, but ideally one would not have to spin the vinyl faster to hear this melody. The record that opened my ears to this concept was released in 1956 - it was Max Roach's playing on Thelonious Monk's "Brilliant Corners" that awakened me to the real beauty of rhythm as melody. The idea of "simultaneous beat collages" sounds interesting, though. The general notion of polyrhythms comes to mind, and I think of early Steve Reich and his work with rhythmic phase patterns, but this is not quite the same as the "chords" you suggest. The trick is that you still have two pieces - one to be played slowly, where waveforms are clearly separate from one another and exist as individual aural events; or where the ear ceases to distunguish the separation between the pulses - much like the eye is fooled into seeing 24 frames per second as continuous motion. Matt Saturday, January 27, 2001, 2:44:56 PM, jon wrote:
quoted 3 lines as a sidenote, when people talk about whether> as a sidenote, when people talk about whether > so-and-so is mostly rythm or mostly melody, it can be > said that all music is really only rythm.
quoted 5 lines when a pulse becomes rapid enough, we begin to hear it> when a pulse becomes rapid enough, we begin to hear it > as pitch, and instead of "bpm" we refer to > "frequency". e.g., when you hear a pitch, you receive > a rapid succession of "beats" (changes of air > pressure) on your eardrum.
quoted 7 lines i could imagine someone (like r. devine maybe) taking> i could imagine someone (like r. devine maybe) taking > this idea and composing with bpm organizations > (instead of pitch organizations). like, simultaneous > beat collages being "chords", etc. then, if you speed > the track up really really fast (imagine gradually > spinning the vinyl faster and faster...) you begin to > hear a melody.
quoted 1 line j> j
quoted 4 lines __________________________________________________> __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. > http://auctions.yahoo.com/
quoted 3 lines ---------------------------------------------------------------------> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-30 00:12R. LimOn Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Matt U wrote: > Well yes, but ideally one would not have to spin the
From:
R. Lim
To:
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:12:35 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] melody is rythm
Reply to:
Re: [idm] melody is rythm
permalink · <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10101291905390.17532-100000@escape.com>
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Matt U wrote:
quoted 5 lines Well yes, but ideally one would not have to spin the vinyl faster to> Well yes, but ideally one would not have to spin the vinyl faster to > hear this melody. The record that opened my ears to this concept was > released in 1956 - it was Max Roach's playing on Thelonious Monk's > "Brilliant Corners" that awakened me to the real beauty of rhythm as > melody.
Yeah, Roach was a genius at this. Other later practitioners of this particularly tonal school of drumming are Masahiko Togashi (active in Japan since the late 60s) and the guy from Supersilent. Before we head off into wave/particle duality, I do want to mention that the original melody/rhythm duality was brought up in the context of Schaeffer et al's _Study of Sound Objects_, which is a fascinating audio essay pertaining to the technical aspects of musique concrete-making and how they relate to sound and language (a relation at the heart of French musique concrete). The system of music production that Russolo talks about in _Art of Noise_ is remarkably to the system that the GRM devised. -rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-30 00:39Arnold LayneG. Who woulda thunk that melody is rhythm. This thread has been so enlightening to me. Tha
From:
Arnold Layne
To:
,
Date:
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:39:32 -0000
Subject:
Re: [idm] melody is rythm
permalink · <F166y4cp51dyZSdA6kv00000e07@hotmail.com>
G. Who woulda thunk that melody is rhythm. This thread has been so enlightening to me. Thanks IDM :) --AL
quoted 32 lines From: "R. Lim" <rlim@escape.com>>From: "R. Lim" <rlim@escape.com> >To: idm@hyperreal.org >Subject: Re: [idm] melody is rythm >Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:12:35 -0500 (EST) > >On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Matt U wrote: > > > Well yes, but ideally one would not have to spin the vinyl faster to > > hear this melody. The record that opened my ears to this concept was > > released in 1956 - it was Max Roach's playing on Thelonious Monk's > > "Brilliant Corners" that awakened me to the real beauty of rhythm as > > melody. > >Yeah, Roach was a genius at this. Other later practitioners of this >particularly tonal school of drumming are Masahiko Togashi (active in >Japan since the late 60s) and the guy from Supersilent. > >Before we head off into wave/particle duality, I do want to mention that >the original melody/rhythm duality was brought up in the context of >Schaeffer et al's _Study of Sound Objects_, which is a fascinating audio >essay pertaining to the technical aspects of musique concrete-making and >how they relate to sound and language (a relation at the heart of French >musique concrete). The system of music production that Russolo talks >about in _Art of Noise_ is remarkably to the system that the GRM devised. > > -rob > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org