179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] why "digital vs analogue" debate is bad

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2000-10-05 22:07Greg Clow [idm] why "digital vs analogue" debate is bad
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-10-05 22:07Greg Clow>analogue facts: >* an analogue signal contains an infinite amount of data. > >digital fac
From:
Greg Clow
To:
Date:
Thu, 05 Oct 2000 18:07:11 -0400
Subject:
[idm] why "digital vs analogue" debate is bad
permalink · <5.0.0.25.0.20001005180120.00a47b20@mail.velocet.net>
quoted 5 lines analogue facts:>analogue facts: >* an analogue signal contains an infinite amount of data. > >digital facts: >* a digital signal contains a finite amount of data.
IDM list facts: * the analogue vs. digital debate has generated an infinite number of posts in previous go-rounds while accomplishing absolutely jack squat In other words: * it's all been said before * everyone has their preferences and nothing anyone can say will change anyone else's mind * all you're going to do is waste everybody's time and bandwidth * did I mention that it's all been said before? In *other* other words: * Please, shut the fuck up. All of you. Greg -- Greg Clow - greg@stainedproductions.com - greg@feedbackmonitor.com concert & event promotions - http://www.stainedproductions.com electronic music radio/reviews/interviews - http://www.feedbackmonitor.com 158 Close Ave. 2nd Floor - Toronto, Ontario M6K 2V5 - Canada --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org