quoted 12 lines Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:57:41 -0700
>Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:57:41 -0700
>From: "Gause, Brian" <bgause@SECTORBASE.COM>
>Subject: warning: peripheral IDM content
>
>...
>course...far be it for me to steal another man's livelihood. But do we
>really want to copyright INFORMATION? This is where it leads, right? Can you
>imagine that world? We'll be paying pennies each time we use someone's
>copywritten metaphor...we'll pay each time we sign our name because our DNA
>strands have all been copywritten and suddenly our signature is a product of
>those copyrights. The more we soak ourselves in money culture, the further
>and further we move away from real freedom.
celera, deCODE, and others are not going to start charging royalties
if you want to have kids. they do want to charge pharmaceutical
companies and private researchers for access to the genomic data they
are collecting. most private sequencing efforts do recognize the need
to offer data for free or at low-cost to non-profit, educational
research institutions. even so, there is pressure from NCBI and other
government projects -- as well as policy by Clinton -- to keep
genomics a mostly non-commercial entity.
invoking some straw man in the name of defending napster is little
better than RIAAs corporate thuggery. let's not get distracted from
the reality that mp3 sharing affects real musicians, while
recognizing at the same time that RIAA represents *labels* and not
musicians, by and large.
information does *not* want to be free. the sooner we accept this,
the sooner we can move on to ways to make sharing information easier
for everyone.
-a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org