179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] warning: peripheral IDM content

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2000-08-01 17:57Gause, Brian [idm] warning: peripheral IDM content
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-08-01 17:57Gause, BrianErnie Thanks for the link...it's cool to see grandmas getting something out of this monstr
From:
Gause, Brian
To:
International Damage Machines
Date:
Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:57:41 -0700
Subject:
[idm] warning: peripheral IDM content
permalink · <8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A231B509A@SECTORBASE1>
Ernie Thanks for the link...it's cool to see grandmas getting something out of this monstrosity. The more I think about napster's plight, the more I see a revolution away from the morality of money. Sure, bootlegging has been around since forever, but only now are we really charged with bootlegging information. If you consider the evolution of this argument, it ends two ways...either ideas gain some form of copyright protection or information becomes free. At least, these would seem to be the two poles of the argument. So where do we go from here? I understand that artists work hard. I understand that some people make their living from their art. I don't want to impinge on this, of course...far be it for me to steal another man's livelihood. But do we really want to copyright INFORMATION? This is where it leads, right? Can you imagine that world? We'll be paying pennies each time we use someone's copywritten metaphor...we'll pay each time we sign our name because our DNA strands have all been copywritten and suddenly our signature is a product of those copyrights. The more we soak ourselves in money culture, the further and further we move away from real freedom. I don't want to undermine the lives and careers of the artists I admire, but freedom, real freedom, should mean everyone. Eventually this is going to mean a move away from monetary morality...if we copyright information, we make knowledge property. This is step one to creating an intellectual class system. Sure, now it's about artists' rights, but then it'll be about scientists' rights...then politicians' rights. Then grandmothers and housewives and children. Are we going to copyright our voices then? So then you'll have yours and I'll have mine and we can go play on our own playground, in our own corner of our sandbox, all by ourselves?? Does anyone else see this sandbox mentality or is it just me?? Private replies might be better as various listmembers are bound to be disturbed by the intersection between music and culture. All thoughts welcome. ---brian ---------------------------------- Brian W. Gause Senior Technical Writer SECTORBASE.com 568 Howard Street First Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Direct: (415) 365-8203 Fax: (415) 365-8263 -----Original Message----- From: Ernesto Ikerd [mailto:IkerdEA@lmtas.lmco.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 10:34 AM To: International Damage Machines Subject: [idm] the fallout of the 'napster' mentality Shame on you people with your bootleg mp3s and copyrights-mean-nothing attitude! You wont stop until your grandmothers are in jail too! http://www.latimes.com/news/front/20000801/t000072072.html ernie Ernesto Ikerd, (817) 763-4795 Company Graphics, Dept 17, MZ-4202 Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Fort Worth, Texas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org