179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] musicians' reference points; fight for control of music

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2000-05-27 04:05Alex Reynolds [idm] musicians' reference points; fight for control of music
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-05-27 04:05Alex ReynoldsFrom skins-meister Lars Ulrich (of Metallica fame) regarding his band's anti-Napster lawsu
From:
Alex Reynolds
To:
Cc:
Date:
Sat, 27 May 2000 00:05:07 -0400
Subject:
[idm] musicians' reference points; fight for control of music
permalink · <l03130305b554f1c23f15@[207.172.160.174]>
From skins-meister Lars Ulrich (of Metallica fame) regarding his band's anti-Napster lawsuit: -- http://slashdot.org/interviews/00/05/26/1251220.shtml -- artists should be allowed to opt out of MP3 distribution framework, e.g. Napster -- use of MP3 (or similar technology) to cut out both record label and distributors is only realistic for groups with larger prescence, i.e. Metallica -- artists should be allowed to distribute (or not) digital media on own terms, i.e. retain control of art -- artists and label not entirely responsible for high cost of CDs -- home taping != perfect digital copies because of quality and scale -- Lars probably fills up his brand new Chevy Suburban with premium unleaded, paid for with the sweat off your backs Are his opinions and reasoning tainted by lawyers from Warner Brothers-owned Elektra Records? Hard to say. He seems to ramble and reiterate several points in answering different questions, almost as if the conversation is scripted (to a degree). Hard to say. Was listening to Robert Fripp's "The Gates of Paradise" the other day. Released back in 1997, his album preceded the Napster explosion by a couple of years. I read the liner notes and found some interesting quotes: "Discipline [Fripp's record label] accepts no reason for artists to assign the copyright interests in their work to either record company or management by virtue of a 'common practice' which was always questionable, often improper, and is now indefensible... "...[T]he artist pays to record the album, generally on an advance provided by the record company...and the album is owned by the record company... If the record company, or the owner of the company, sells the catalogue or the company itself, the artist receives nothing for their work, even though the artist paid for it to be made... [This is true, sadly enough: refer to http://www.awa.com/w2/off_track/ot-1.10.html for an instance of this] "The artists affirm their moral rights to be acknowledged the authors of these works... "Let us sadly acknowledge, in the spirit of preparing the future and repairing the past, that the publishing industry and music industry has often and repeatedly failed to treat its artists honourably, equitably and with common decency... "Cynicism and bitterness are natural, reasonable and likely responses for anyone, whether performer or audient, who knows a close relationship with those who control money flows within the music industry; music can be a gate to Paradise, but cynicism holds us at the threshold... "Any culture whose artists are directed or controlled by commercial interests is in mortal danger. Any artist directed or controlled by commercial interests is in mortal danger. Any artist willingly directed or controlled by commercial interests is not to be trusted. "The history of the music industry is a history of exploitation and theft." -Robert Fripp, The Gates of Paradise "No, I do not drive a Suburban." -ibid. -a. Alex Reynolds Biology IT Support SAS Computing University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104 V +1 215 573.2818 F +1 215 898.8780 http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~reynolda/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org