179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) < classify! >

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) < classify! > · (idm) < classify! >
1999-10-27 18:34(idm) < classify! >
└─ 1999-10-27 20:23Aaron S Michelson Re: (idm) < classify! >
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-10-27 18:34BigKumquat@aol.comThe advantage of the sheer "alphabetical by artist" approach is that you don't have to pon
From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 27 Oct 1999 14:34:23 EDT
Subject:
(idm) < classify! >
permalink · <0.5b740feb.25489faf@aol.com>
The advantage of the sheer "alphabetical by artist" approach is that you don't have to ponder genre dilemmas ad nauseum. On the other hand, sections can be fun - perhaps a few special sections housed on special shelves. I know there are times (e.g. zoning/sleepytime) when nothing but ambient will do, and its a fine thing to have all ambient titles stashed together somewhere (monolake's gobi ep is current ambient champ). In my sytem, artist releases must be grouped according to date of release, rather than alphabetically by title. Exciting, no? Man, I've got librarian blood in my family. Imagine going to Simon Reynolds' place and checking out his categories: heroin house, geektronica, thrashstep, crunch-and-twinkle, nerdcore and so on. - Fred Church http://www.thelocus.com/kumquat - free kumquat cd's, always and forever, until we run out -
1999-10-27 20:23Aaron S MichelsonExcerpts from mail: 27-Oct-99 (idm) < classify! > by BigKumquat@aol.com > On the other han
From:
Aaron S Michelson
To:
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:23:07 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) < classify! >
Reply to:
(idm) < classify! >
permalink · <4s5pwfG00UiB06CbA0@andrew.cmu.edu>
Excerpts from mail: 27-Oct-99 (idm) < classify! > by BigKumquat@aol.com
quoted 2 lines On the other hand, sections can be fun - perhaps a few special sections> On the other hand, sections can be fun - perhaps a few special sections > housed on special shelves.
My solution: 1500 CDs.... I have a huge rotating rack that I store things... some by artist (and related) i.e. Autechre/Skam, Aphex Twin, anything Global Communication do, etc. Then I have some by label... Rephlex stack, the Source stack, the Ninja Tune stacks, etc. etc. I also have a special CD rack just for FAX records releases.... I have around 80 of them, so they fit nicely in one of those cheap black plastic things. Then sorta kinda by style.... a few stacks of mixed CDs.... and the rest is just thrown in there where ever I have room. I also have two fully-packed US Post Office crates filled with CDs I don't usually listen to, but feel like holding onto (for some reason). 1300 Records.... Bought industrial shelving from Home Hardware for $40. All the stuff I usually play out is kind of in the middle of each shelf. The stuff I don't play out too much is on the sides... crap is on the bottom. Some jungle-related stuff is on one shelf on the left-ish side... :) So you see, I'm organized. Not to mention the 100+ records and CDs strewn all over my floor and covering all my equipment. Aaron