179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) the fragile REVIEW

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-09-29 18:42(idm) the fragile REVIEW
└─ 1999-09-29 22:53Mark Stevens Re: (idm) the fragile REVIEW
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-09-29 18:42PLeXitMIND@aol.comHere is a review my friend wrote: THE FRAGILE Five years have past since the birth of ‘the
From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:42:08 EDT
Subject:
(idm) the fragile REVIEW
permalink · <c6ae5009.2523b780@aol.com>
Here is a review my friend wrote: THE FRAGILE Five years have past since the birth of ‘the downward spiral’, and its influence can undoubtedly be seen. Between ‘pretty hate machine’ and ‘the downward spiral’, Trent Reznor has influenced and inspired a countless number of computer nerds, rockers, and metal-heads. Trent’s genius was to take aspects of industrial, ambient, synth-pop, and rock and mesh them together in a manner never seen by the music community before. With a broad range of influences like prince, black sabbath, depeche mode, skinny puppy, david bowie, coil, ministry, public enemy, afx, and pink floyd, some people say he took a lot of avant-garde electronic elements and techniques and added a hook to it. It is very hard to distill an unfriendly genre for public consumption without ruining its core essence. Reznor did not ruin the essence of the underground; he embraced it. Regardless of what he did, Reznor is one of the most respected musicians of this decade commanding respect in both the underground and the mainstream. Now, with the new album ‘the fragile’, people are wondering if it lives up to the hype and standards laid out by the first two albums. What Reznor has done here is made a concept album about anger, despair, distrust, and betrayal that covers a broad range of genres from metal, industrial, electronica(HAHA), rock, funk, and soundtracky sounding stuff. While the album may not be a total innovation and reinvention, it is definitely a great album and a nice progression for Trent Reznor. You are not going to find better production and engineering than what you will find on this album. Every sound has been fucked, ducked, shucked, stacked, toyed, plowed, and eq’d for days on end. All the sounds have their own special and distinct place in the sonic environment. Even when things do seem to be out of place or too dense, they eventually begin to make sense with repeated listens. The use of stereo is very cool on this album (not as cool as Richard Devine or monolake), but still very interesting in places. I was hoping that Trent would have a lot more of the idm influence on the new album. We all know Trent loves aphex and autechre. Just for my taste, I would have liked to seen more of the current underground electronic element on the album. Oh well. The album has a lot of different instrumentation: cello, upright bass, guitar, slide guitar, synth, ukulele, piano, computer, trumpet, ect…. The arrangements are also very interesting with the use of a wide range of song structures. While there is a lot of variety on ‘the fragile’, there is still that recurring nin formula at work here: the use of a build up to power guitar/noise choruses and crescendos. No one seems to do this better than nin, but for my tastes I would have like to seen it used a little bit less here. Every time a song kicks into a chorus, there seems to be a guitar somewhere in the mix, usually the most prevalent thing. I sometimes long for the synth driven choruses of ‘pretty hate machine’. Trent does just as good a job at low decibel levels as he does at loud decibels (see the great below for instance). I think the album could have been a little stronger if it would have had a few more tracks in that vein, and a few less loud guitar tracks. How bout a little more melodicism here and there, we know you got it in you Trent. It would have also been nice to see a couple of dance tracks on there too. Maybe I am asking for too much variety? I don’t know……. I guess after a five year wait, I just want a taste of everything Trent does well. The sound design is good as usual. Tracks like ‘somewhat damaged’ ‘the way out is through’ and ‘the big comedown’ have wicked new sounds and textures. While the sound design is great in some places I think it is lacking in others. The tracks ‘the wretched’ and ‘please’ have rehashes of sounds that were on ‘the downward spiral’ and ‘antichrist superstar’ respectively. The title track has the use of a jp- 8000 preset in the break down. (presets are not fucking cool). By the middle of the second disc I begin to get tired of that processed fuzz guitar. Enough already. Do something different. Sound creation has limitless possibilities. That is just me being picky of course. All in all, the sound design is still pretty tight and Reznor has become one of the greatest texturalist of the past ten years. Lyrically the album is not as bleak as ‘the downward spiral’, but is still pretty dark thematically. Trent seems to offer a little more hope on this album than on previous. He has also matured vocally. He is still not the greatest singer in the world but his technique seems to have gotten better and varied (‘the wretched and ‘the big come down’). Either way, I have always been a fan of Trent’s emotional vocals. Overall, the album is really tight. The typical nin tracks are better than ever, and the tracks that are the least like nin are even better. Trent definitely has a sound that he can call his own. All the instrumentals are worth something real special and make me feel all gooey inside with their sci-fi appeal. "The fragile’ is the type of album that makes more sense on the fifth or sixth listen then on the first listen; that is the mark of a great album when it doesn’t reveal itself to one immediately. ‘The fragile’ may not be the total reinvention and innovation some people were hoping for but it is definitely a big growth for Mr. Trent Reznor. It may have a few setbacks that keep it from the being a masterpiece like ‘the downward spiral’, but you are still not going to find a rock album this year that has as much depth and smarts as ‘the fragile’. 9 of 10
1999-09-29 22:53Mark StevensHere's a reply to the message "(idm) the fragile REVIEW" you wrote on Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:
From:
Mark Stevens
To:
Date:
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 22:53:17 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) the fragile REVIEW
Reply to:
(idm) the fragile REVIEW
permalink · <37f29725.44884077@relay.clara.net>
Here's a reply to the message "(idm) the fragile REVIEW" you wrote on Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:42:08 EDT:
quoted 2 lines While the album may not be a total innovation and reinvention, it is>While the album may not be a total innovation and reinvention, it is >definitely a great album and a nice progression for Trent Reznor.
Hmm, I thought Fragile was pretty mediocre. I was hoping for something a little bit more progressive, but it's just the same old NIN style. Out of the 20+ tracks on the double album, I think I only found a couple that were halfway interesting. Certainly not enough meat on the bone to justify spending 17 quid. Don't get me wrong -- diehard NIN fans need it in their collection, but the "more of the same" factor just doesn't do it for me. I still think that "Perfect Drug" and the original Quake soundtrack are the best things Reznor's done since "Downward Spiral". -- Mark Stevens http://www.headspin.clara.net/