179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) house discussion

7 messages · 7 participants · spans 24 days · search this subject
◇ merged from 3 subjects: (idm) "only stupid people call it intelligent" · (idm) good morning house · (idm) house discussion
1999-08-28 03:48Spiral of Evolution Re: (idm) "Only Stupid People Call it Intelligent"
└─ 1999-09-18 18:09Irene McC (idm) good morning house
└─ 1999-09-20 21:15Alistair White (idm) house discussion
1999-09-20 21:44Re: (idm) house discussion
└─ 1999-09-20 22:46n:h Re: (idm) house discussion
1999-09-21 02:17blipvert Re: (idm) house discussion
1999-09-21 09:54Re: (idm) house discussion
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-08-28 03:48Spiral of EvolutionI have to agree with this point of view. I spin a lot or underground, deep, morning house
From:
Spiral of Evolution
To:
Date:
Fri, 27 Aug 1999 20:48:40 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) "Only Stupid People Call it Intelligent"
permalink · <19990827.204852.2694.1.Trigometric@juno.com>
I have to agree with this point of view. I spin a lot or underground, deep, morning house that I feel is just as every bit intelligent as Autechre or B-12. Just depends on how you're listening to it. Derek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All times being relative; what time does Munich arrive at this train? --Nietzche On Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:25:25 -0400 Chris Fahey <chrisf@raremedium.com> writes:
quoted 86 lines I've heard lots of very sophisticated dance music that probably would>I've heard lots of very sophisticated dance music that probably would >= >repel >most of the people on this list, music which rarely makes it out of >the >clubs. I'm talking about house music with divas. In many ways lots of >= >this >IDM stuff is comparatively much more commercial than some of the best, >= >most >interesting underground house.=20 > >Yes, there's a high-profile brand of house which is unoriginal, = >retarded, >and commercial, but just cuz the "House Explosion vol 9" compilation = >CD's >they sell at tower records are bad doesn't mean that there isn't house >= >out >there that would blow your socks off and make Global Goon look like an >amateur tinkerer (not hard). > >Some Basic Channel or Carl Craig crosses into what I'm talking about = >(in >terms of being, at heart, house music), but is that as far towards = >house >this list will venture. Why? > >It's a monstrous error to say that house/techno/disco/dance club music >= >is >somehow less intelligently created or heard than IDM, and I often = >suspect >that the difference boils down to class/race/sexual preference. One = >could >argue pretty convincingly that IDM =3D dance music for straight white >= >middle >class guys who can't dance. There's an entire world of dance music out >= >there >which is both booty shaking and very experimental in nature, but it's >= >almost >never discussed on the IDM list. It's sad - In fact, I have to rely on >= >my >club-DJ friends to even expose me to this stuff.=20 > >Not that I'm not guilty too - in order to become an aficianado of IDM, >= >all >you need is some money and an email account, but to find out about >interesting underground house you have to be pretty hardcore about >your >nightlife habits and probably have to be a professional DJ. If you = >think >about it, IDM is in a way dance music's latest stab at bringing = >underground >electronic dance music out of the exclusive control of professional >DJs = >and >into our homes and offices, whereas underground house is still an = >arcane >knowledge to which access is extremely difficult. IDM fans buy records >= >and >CDs, while house fans go to clubs, listen, and dance. > >Sometimes I think this list needs to be a little more house-broken, so >= >to >speak.=20 > > > >' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - > > c h r i s t =F8 p h e r f =AA h e y > >. _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ > chrisf@raremedium.com >2 1 2 - 6 3 4 - 6 9 5 0 x 2 5 8 > http://www.raremedium.com >- ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - .=20
___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
1999-09-18 18:09Irene McCOn 27 Aug 99, Spiral of Evolution wrote re: Re: (idm) "Only Stupid People Call : > I spin
From:
Irene McC
To:
,
Date:
Sat, 18 Sep 1999 20:09:52 +0200
Subject:
(idm) good morning house
Reply to:
Re: (idm) "Only Stupid People Call it Intelligent"
permalink · <E11SOvQ-000O58-00@smtp03.iafrica.com>
On 27 Aug 99, Spiral of Evolution wrote re: Re: (idm) "Only Stupid People Call :
quoted 2 lines I spin a lot or underground, deep, morning house that I feel is> I spin a lot or underground, deep, morning house that I feel is > just as every bit intelligent as Autechre or B-12.
Was this is typo, or is there such a category as "morning house" ??? Moving, maybe? Recently I find myself drifting more and more towards what might be classified as deep house, especially the more melodic end of the IDM spectrum rather than power drills and washing mashines. I *
1999-09-20 21:15Alistair WhiteOn Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Irene McC wrote: > Recently I find myself drifting more and more towa
From:
Alistair White
To:
Date:
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:15:45 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
(idm) house discussion
Reply to:
(idm) good morning house
permalink · <Pine.SGI.3.96.990920161239.2721A-100000@nicar.org>
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Irene McC wrote:
quoted 3 lines Recently I find myself drifting more and more towards what might> Recently I find myself drifting more and more towards what might > be classified as deep house, especially the more melodic end of > the IDM spectrum rather than power drills and washing mashines.
i think tetsu inoue says in the urbansounds interview something about anyone can make weird, fucked-up sounding music, the harder thing to do is make it accessible. -Alistair White www.ire.org/~al
1999-09-20 21:44phlux@ix.netcom.comOn 09/20/99 16:15:45 you wrote: > >On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Irene McC wrote: > >> Recently I f
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:44:18 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) house discussion
permalink · <19999201738426334@ix.netcom.com>
On 09/20/99 16:15:45 you wrote:
quoted 10 lines On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Irene McC wrote:> >On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Irene McC wrote: > >> Recently I find myself drifting more and more towards what might >> be classified as deep house, especially the more melodic end of >> the IDM spectrum rather than power drills and washing mashines. > >i think tetsu inoue says in the urbansounds interview something about >anyone can make weird, fucked-up sounding music, the harder thing to do is >make it accessible.
I'm not really sure Tetsuo had that one nailed down right. After writing D&B and techno stuff for years, I did a little expirement last year about this time: try and write some pop songs. I got a female vocalist fot the tracks and everything. I actually found it a little bit easier to do. Most accessible music relies on very predictable ] formulas which are pretty easy to pick up. I think the only real challenge,at least for me, was not not to fuck with the sound. Rob listening to some kick ass Xyn tracks component records http://www.mindstorm.com/component codec-fragments coming soon!
1999-09-20 22:46n:hI think its somewhere in the middle; the difficulty is in making unique, 'weird sounding'
From:
n:h
To:
Cc:
,
Date:
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:46:26 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) house discussion
Reply to:
Re: (idm) house discussion
permalink · <Pine.MAC.4.10.9909201835540.12215-100000@tl1.toshoklabs.com>
I think its somewhere in the middle; the difficulty is in making unique, 'weird sounding' and yet accesible music. I guess this is my biggest beef with the recent Ae output, including the peel seesions last week someone was kind enough to post. It seems they are too wrapped up in mechanical processes. Amber and Tri Repatae-period Ae really grab me with the combination of the sobering melodies and complex (well I guess not to today's standards) programming. The strings on these records! Sheesh! Whatever happened to them? LP5 did a great job of giving us a thorough(SP?) dose of the abstract combined with great melodic progressions. Unfortunatley I haven't lately heard too much 'over-programmed' music with this human quality to it. 2 fairly recent records that do succeed in this respect is Colongib's Mapping Music and the new Hravtski. That last track! whew! On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 phlux@ix.netcom.com wrote:
quoted 27 lines On 09/20/99 16:15:45 you wrote:> On 09/20/99 16:15:45 you wrote: > > > >On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Irene McC wrote: > > > >> Recently I find myself drifting more and more towards what might > >> be classified as deep house, especially the more melodic end of > >> the IDM spectrum rather than power drills and washing mashines. > > > >i think tetsu inoue says in the urbansounds interview something about > >anyone can make weird, fucked-up sounding music, the harder thing to do is > >make it accessible. > > I'm not really sure Tetsuo had that one nailed down right. After writing > D&B and techno stuff for years, I did a little expirement last year > about this time: try and write some pop songs. I got a female > vocalist fot the tracks and everything. I actually found it a little > bit easier to do. Most accessible music relies on very predictable ] > formulas which are pretty easy to pick up. I think the only real > challenge,at least for me, was not not to fuck with the sound. > > Rob > listening to some kick ass Xyn tracks > > component records > http://www.mindstorm.com/component > codec-fragments coming soon! >
1999-09-21 02:17blipvertI'm not sure that you are making a strong argument for the ease or difficulty of writing a
From:
blipvert
To:
,
Date:
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 21:17:20 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) house discussion
permalink · <37E6E9BF.D66EE34@arkansas.net>
I'm not sure that you are making a strong argument for the ease or difficulty of writing a house track. House tracks are accessible but they are not pop songs. Good house tracks are accessible, usualy soulful or funky and often trippy or experimental without ever falling into a trap of being chin-scratching music for music listeners. House music is first and foremost about a vibe. You can't think your way into it though it might be impressive from a production or technical viewpoint. From a DJs perspective, house music is some of the more difficult music to mix. It is difficult to conceal mistakes in beat matching during mixes because all of the quarter notes are marked with kick drums. Mistakes in beat matching sound like flams or stutters of beats and are very apparent. House music is not accessible because it is simple and the history and present of house music is not simple. It is almost spiritual, there is no point in me trying to describe it. House music is the foundation of idm, d & b and blah, blah blah. Or at least those genres would not exist without house music getting the whole thing going. Idm would not exist without DJs and clubs and parties creating a possibility of dance music that you listen to outside of a dance music enxironment. If you guys can even ponder the interest of house music or whether or not house music is interesting, you realy should get out from behind the computer and go out to a party or a club, live a little and see why the music that you discuss exists in the first place. phlux@ix.netcom.com wrote:
quoted 26 lines On 09/20/99 16:15:45 you wrote:> On 09/20/99 16:15:45 you wrote: > > > >On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Irene McC wrote: > > > >> Recently I find myself drifting more and more towards what might > >> be classified as deep house, especially the more melodic end of > >> the IDM spectrum rather than power drills and washing mashines. > > > >i think tetsu inoue says in the urbansounds interview something about > >anyone can make weird, fucked-up sounding music, the harder thing to do is > >make it accessible. > > I'm not really sure Tetsuo had that one nailed down right. After writing > D&B and techno stuff for years, I did a little expirement last year > about this time: try and write some pop songs. I got a female > vocalist fot the tracks and everything. I actually found it a little > bit easier to do. Most accessible music relies on very predictable ] > formulas which are pretty easy to pick up. I think the only real > challenge,at least for me, was not not to fuck with the sound. > > Rob > listening to some kick ass Xyn tracks > > component records > http://www.mindstorm.com/component > codec-fragments coming soon!
1999-09-21 09:54Magicnerd8@aol.comAnyone who questions the validity or energy of House music should experience a Mistress Ba
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 05:54:55 EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) house discussion
permalink · <1c74196d.2518afef@aol.com>
Anyone who questions the validity or energy of House music should experience a Mistress Barbara set...my that woman is amazing. Two turntables and a 909 (Hawtin stylez in effect), delivering blistering (the only word to describe the set I heard at Area 51 a couple months ago) 4/4 mindfucks...sigh.... -The Objector