179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT

5 messages · 4 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, post techno is where it's at · (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, post techno is where it's at
1999-08-06 05:03papagilly (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
1999-08-06 16:32Dave Segal Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
└─ 1999-08-06 17:42Jeff Pitrman Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
└─ 1999-08-06 17:44Andrew Hime Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
1999-08-07 03:51papagilly Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-08-06 05:03papagillysorry I don't follow the threads, but "post-rock this" and "post modern/meta modern that"
From:
papagilly
To:
Date:
Thu, 05 Aug 1999 22:03:50 -0700
Subject:
(idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
permalink · <37AA6CB5.4E58984F@earthlink.net>
sorry I don't follow the threads, but "post-rock this" and "post modern/meta modern that" keeps popping up in my my box (time for some filters) So I thought I'd add my .02cents... for post techno experimentalism listen to anything on Rather Interesting and then burn the rest of your IDM collection *trust me I've been tempted many times, cuz this shit is LIGHT YEARS ahead of any one else we talk about on this list* btw- NO Uwe is NOT married to LISA CARBON and...NO Uwe is NOT LISA CARBON either -gilly (uwefanatic)
1999-08-06 16:32Dave Segal>for post techno experimentalism listen to anything on Rather Interesting >and then burn t
From:
Dave Segal
To:
Date:
Fri, 06 Aug 1999 12:32:21 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
permalink · <19990806162638.28231.qmail@hyperreal.org>
quoted 5 lines for post techno experimentalism listen to anything on Rather Interesting>for post techno experimentalism listen to anything on Rather Interesting >and then burn the rest of your IDM collection >*trust me I've been tempted many times, cuz this shit is LIGHT YEARS ahead >of any one else we talk about >on this list*
Besides being environmentally disastrous, gilly's call to "burn the rest of your IDM collection" is awfully blinkered. With little effort, I can think of dozens of artists who equal or surpass anything on RI. Please keep such narrow-minded, extremist thoughts like the above to yourself. Dave Segal Managing Editor/Alternative Press Reviews/BPM/Reissue Redux/Origins Of Cool Secret Ions on WCSB Thursdays 9-11PM EST www.wcsb.org
1999-08-06 17:42Jeff PitrmanAt 12:32 PM 8/6/99 -0400, Dave Segal wrote: >>for post techno experimentalism Really, I ca
From:
Jeff Pitrman
To:
Dave Segal ,
Date:
Fri, 06 Aug 1999 10:42:34 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
Reply to:
Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
permalink · <199908061737.KAA17469@avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
At 12:32 PM 8/6/99 -0400, Dave Segal wrote:
quoted 1 line for post techno experimentalism>>for post techno experimentalism
Really, I can't wait to see the first cd that's released with a sticker that says "POST-IDM (Something)" on it. I wonder which label will succumb to the temptation first? - post-neo-jeffism ---- "There is no gang of 'intelligent techno' freaks here who break showroom windows to steal pocket calculators." - Jouni Alkio Jeff Pitrman [cCM] jeff@spof.net http://bling.spof.net
1999-08-06 17:44Andrew Hime> At 12:32 PM 8/6/99 -0400, Dave Segal wrote: > >>for post techno experimentalism > > Real
From:
Andrew Hime
To:
,
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 6 Aug 1999 12:44:53 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
Reply to:
Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
permalink · <199908061744.MAA58586@kali.wf.net>
quoted 6 lines At 12:32 PM 8/6/99 -0400, Dave Segal wrote:> At 12:32 PM 8/6/99 -0400, Dave Segal wrote: > >>for post techno experimentalism > > Really, I can't wait to see the first cd that's released with a sticker > that says "POST-IDM (Something)" on it. I wonder which label will succumb > to the temptation first?
Shit... time to go order more stickers. Maybe for One Piece's record instead.
1999-08-07 03:51papagilly> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 12:32:21 -0400 > From: "Dave Segal" > Subject: Re: (idm) post-roc
From:
papagilly
To:
Date:
Fri, 06 Aug 1999 20:51:48 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT
permalink · <37ABAD54.E87CD81@earthlink.net>
quoted 19 lines Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 12:32:21 -0400> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 12:32:21 -0400 > From: "Dave Segal" > Subject: Re: (idm) post-rock, post-modern, fuck that, POST TECHNO IS WHERE IT'S AT > > >for post techno experimentalism listen to anything on Rather Interesting > >and then burn the rest of your IDM collection > >*trust me I've been tempted many times, cuz this shit is LIGHT YEARS ahead > >of any one else we talk about > >on this list* > > Besides being environmentally disastrous, gilly's call to "burn > the rest of your IDM collection" is awfully blinkered. With little > effort, I can think of dozens of artists who equal or surpass anything on > RI. > Please keep such narrow-minded, extremist > thoughts like the above to yourself. > > Dave Segal >
well narrow-minded? extremist? Possibly. I mean, this is just how impressed I am with the output on RI compared to the level of musical programmng/compositions of many of the artists we discuss on this list. Most of the stuff on RI has NO patience for repetition. Maybe RI impresses me sooo much cuz Uwe hardly listens to electronic music at all. Thus he avoids sounding like other artists. Think of all the Rephlex/Ae clones we've debated about for the last 2-3years???? Trust me, I love many IDM artists, but their attention to detail can't compare IMO. I don't know, maybe I'm hearing things in RI material you are not. To each his own.... g