179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) recent post

5 messages · 5 participants · spans 3 days · search this subject
1999-06-04 15:16(idm) recent post
├─ 1999-06-04 15:23martin Re: (idm) recent post
└─ 1999-06-04 15:59Greg Clow Re: (idm) recent post
1999-06-04 15:53david turgeon Re: (idm) recent post
1999-06-07 14:30Kelley Hackett RE: (idm) recent post
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-06-04 15:16Ambientidm@aol.comrecently someone named david turgeon (eerie@mnemonic.net) posted to the list something abo
From:
To:
Date:
Fri, 4 Jun 1999 11:16:48 EDT
Subject:
(idm) recent post
permalink · <320e6416.248947e0@aol.com>
recently someone named david turgeon (eerie@mnemonic.net) posted to the list something about gil gershman. that's all good and well, but the closing of the letter featured this "FAGgOtS!!!!!!!!!!!". I'm not sure whether this is a joke, but I, for one, do not find any humour in it. let me make it simple. I believe that we MUST NOT post anything racist, sexist or preferentialist to this list. bmP
1999-06-04 15:23martin>recently someone named david turgeon (eerie@mnemonic.net) posted to the list >something a
From:
martin
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 4 Jun 1999 16:23:25 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) recent post
Reply to:
(idm) recent post
permalink · <0682.990604@advent-comm.co.uk>
quoted 9 lines recently someone named david turgeon (eerie@mnemonic.net) posted to the list>recently someone named david turgeon (eerie@mnemonic.net) posted to the list >something about gil gershman. that's all good and well, but the closing of >the letter featured this "FAGgOtS!!!!!!!!!!!". I'm not sure whether this is >a joke, but I, for one, do not find any humour in it. > >let me make it simple. I believe that we MUST NOT post anything racist, >sexist or preferentialist to this list. > >bmP
what does preferentialist mean dad?
1999-06-04 15:59Greg ClowOn Fri, 4 Jun 1999 Ambientidm@aol.com wrote: > let me make it simple. I believe that we MU
From:
Greg Clow
To:
Date:
Fri, 4 Jun 1999 11:59:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) recent post
Reply to:
(idm) recent post
permalink · <Pine.BSI.3.96r.990604115510.25327H-100000@shell1.interlog.com>
On Fri, 4 Jun 1999 Ambientidm@aol.com wrote:
quoted 2 lines let me make it simple. I believe that we MUST NOT post anything racist,> let me make it simple. I believe that we MUST NOT post anything racist, > sexist or preferentialist to this list.
So, if I call you a wop chink nigger honkey cracker peckerwood white-trash faggot lesbo towel-head camel-jockey jungle bunny, it's a bad thing? OK. Thanks for clearing that up. Greg PS: for the humour impared - IT'S A JOKE! Settle down.
1999-06-04 15:53david turgeon> recently someone named david turgeon (eerie@mnemonic.net) posted to the list > something
From:
david turgeon
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 04 Jun 1999 11:53:52 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) recent post
permalink · <3757F682.6CF0AC28@mnemonic.net>
quoted 6 lines recently someone named david turgeon (eerie@mnemonic.net) posted to the list> recently someone named david turgeon (eerie@mnemonic.net) posted to the list > something about gil gershman. that's all good and well, but the closing of > the letter featured this "FAGgOtS!!!!!!!!!!!". I'm not sure whether this is > a joke, but I, for one, do not find any humour in it. > let me make it simple. I believe that we MUST NOT post anything racist, > sexist or preferentialist to this list.
i'll repeat what i said privately to someone else with a similar concern: the "faggots" thing was a spoof of our good friend & listmember hk! who said something similar (though as of now i have no idea if that was humor or not.) trust me, i believe racism, sexism, homophobia & intolerance in general to be despicable attitudes coming from a flawed reasoning, & i won't accept any justification for it. but to jump everytime you hear say "faggot" or "nigger" without figuring out the context brings the other problem: by making these words taboo, we are giving them the property of being even more insulting. but of course that's just me. i'll try to refrain from using one of these words in the future without adding at least a paragraph to explain the context. -- david turgeon at http://www.notype.com
1999-06-07 14:30Kelley HackettOOOOOOhhhhhh woe is me, I am guilty as charged! But I kinda agree with David here! I am Af
From:
Kelley Hackett
To:
'david turgeon'
Cc:
'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Mon, 7 Jun 1999 09:30:27 -0500
Subject:
RE: (idm) recent post
permalink · <397CA68ABF5AD111863C00805F0DDE980CB480@ABA_PDC>
OOOOOOhhhhhh woe is me, I am guilty as charged! But I kinda agree with David here! I am African American True, if someone on the list typed Nigger---which literally means trashy or a stingy person----would have no effect on me. I know that I am far from this connotation---thus its just words----------. Of course, if the shoe fits wear it! So if someone typed U impatient jerk, then this applies! Still, has anyone ever seen me post something like this just for fun, or what some keep typing as a joke! Nope, not guilty on that charge---usually its out of the principle of a matter(for example when several list members lashout at ONE person) Its all Genuine though, I will try and tone down my comments in the future VIVA Hk!
quoted 40 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message----- > From: david turgeon [SMTP:eerie@mnemonic.net] > Sent: Friday, June 04, 1999 10:54 AM > To: Ambientidm@aol.com > Cc: idm@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: (idm) recent post > > > > recently someone named david turgeon (eerie@mnemonic.net) posted to > the list > > something about gil gershman. that's all good and well, but the > closing of > > the letter featured this "FAGgOtS!!!!!!!!!!!". I'm not sure whether > this is > > a joke, but I, for one, do not find any humour in it. > > let me make it simple. I believe that we MUST NOT post anything > racist, > > sexist or preferentialist to this list. > > i'll repeat what i said privately to someone else with a similar > concern: the "faggots" thing was a spoof of our good friend & > listmember hk! who said something similar (though as of now i have no > idea if that was humor or not.) > > trust me, i believe racism, sexism, homophobia & intolerance in > general > to be despicable attitudes coming from a flawed reasoning, & i won't > accept any justification for it. but to jump everytime you hear say > "faggot" or "nigger" without figuring out the context brings the other > problem: by making these words taboo, we are giving them the property > of > being even more insulting. > > but of course that's just me. i'll try to refrain from using one of > these words in the future without adding at least a paragraph to > explain > the context. > > -- > david turgeon at http://www.notype.com