hmm... i though windowlicker would have sounded right at home as another
remix of come to daddy. he's been doing the fucked up vocal thing since
RDJ (or girl/boy ep, if you prefer, but that really *was* singing), and
this seemed to be an extension of that to me.
as far as accessibility, i don't think it's any more or less accessible
than a lot of his other stuff. it's just that now he has more of a name,
and it's being pushed by sire. i think girl/boy song is way more
accessible than windowlicker (i always imagine what it would sound like
for a marching band arrangement - there's potential there, especially when
the xylophones kick in. and it would give those kids something to do with
those quad and trip drums), but that was back in '96, and maybe sire
didn't need the money as badly.
either way, i think it's pretty nifty. i'm just interested in what a whole
album's worth of material is going to sound like.
alan!
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Moonlight wrote:
quoted 11 lines Well, he's discarded everything that he had sounded like before that, and
> Well, he's discarded everything that he had sounded like before that, and
> made something that's incredibly accessible considering his fanbase.
>
> I can think of nothing that's similar to it at all.
> "Essex Fobbie" would have been a typical RDJ track, more of the same stuff,
> but I picture "Windowlicker" as "linearly independent" (probably because
> i'm a math geek) to the rest of the music he (and prob. anyone else) has
> produced. It's like a punk rocker doing a pop song that's clearly pop and
> definitely a new kind of pop. Experimentally tame and accessible.
> (I think i'm repeating myself.)
>