179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) the people vs. diy

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-03-25 19:56Noah (idm) the people vs. diy
1999-03-25 22:19Sharon Maher Re: (idm) the people vs. diy
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-03-25 19:56Noah>>" i would recommend, however, ditching the cd-r method and fronting the >>money to a dup
From:
Noah
To:
Date:
Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:56:37 -0500
Subject:
(idm) the people vs. diy
permalink · <3.0.6.32.19990325145637.0091e430@clarku.edu>
quoted 6 lines " i would recommend, however, ditching the cd-r method and fronting the>>" i would recommend, however, ditching the cd-r method and fronting the >>money to a duplication plant. save you time and headaches.. " > >if I only wanna make 50-100 copies of my cd, HOW do I do this without >having to ALSO pay BIG MONEY (~$500) for a glass master? it's just NOT >cost effective.
you're asking HOW? well, that's the thing. there is no easy way to make only 50-100 copies of your cd. every plant that i've seen has a 500 disc minimum. you can burn them yourself, if you have a cd-r, but it is very time consuming, and throwing down the $500 for duplication saves you that. if you think that you can make a good portion of that 500 back by selling your work, then that's the best bet. plus, when you have 500 copies of your cd, you can afford to throw them around, give them to random people, bring them with you to shows, etc etc. im sure you can see the advantages of that.. also, to my knowlege, a glass master is not needed for (most? several? some?) plants. they can take a regular old cd-r. i guess it depends on how serious you are about what you're doing. if you're just making a few copies for friends, then home burning is the way to go. but once you start the process of going to a printshop for artwork, and burning and labeling 100+ cds in your own spare time, you start to question if it's really worth it. i've easily spent at least $300 on my 'diy' homeburnt cd so far. had i invested that money in a plant, i'd have 500 copies of my cd by now, and i would've saved all the time spent doing silly production things, and been able to write more music instead. noah
1999-03-25 22:19Sharon Maher> also, to my knowFrom idm-owner-idm-archive=hyperreal.org@hyperreal.org Thu Mar 25 21:28:
From:
Sharon Maher
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:19:06 -0800
Subject:
Re: (idm) the people vs. diy
permalink · <36FAB65A.82AD3CF9@looksmart.net>
quoted 1 line also, to my knowFrom idm-owner-idm-archive=hyperreal.org@hyperreal.org Thu Mar 25 21:28:33> also, to my knowFrom idm-owner-idm-archive=hyperreal.org@hyperreal.org Thu Mar 25 21:28:33 1999
Return-Path: <idm-owner-idm-archive=hyperreal.org@hyperreal.org> Delivered-To: idm-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 25651 invoked by uid 6000); 25 Mar 1999 21:28:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 25627 invoked from network); 25 Mar 1999 21:28:27 -0000 Received: from sagan.askjeeves.com (204.71.204.2) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 1999 21:28:27 -0000 Received: by sagan.askjeeves.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <H4827NAP>; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:28:35 -0800 Message-ID: <959045D7661AD211BA5200A0C983766AA2ADEB@sagan.askjeeves.com> From: Philip Sherburne <philip@Ask.com> To: "'idm@hyperreal.org'" <idm@hyperreal.org> Cc: "'clietz@planetdirect.com'" <clietz@planetdirect.com> Subject: FW: (idm) raster/noton+ question Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:10:15 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: idm-owner@hyperreal.org Precedence: bulk
quoted 27 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message----- > From: chris + [SMTP:clietz@planetdirect.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 11:17 AM > To: philip@Ask.com > Cc: idm@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: (idm) raster/noton+ question > > > "Mikro/Makro," by Noto and Mika Vainio, is another great one. Four > sides (a > > 2x10"; I'm not sure if it's also a CD), each artist takes 2 sides. For > this > this was released on cd, 2 tracks by each so i assume it is the same as > the vinyl. i think this is more minimal than th e 2000 series, almost > hard to concentrate on except for the few clicks that pinch a nerve in > your neck. > > > > Recently I picked up another record -- maybe Noton, maybe Raster -- a > > recording of a performance on shortwave radio, recorded some 10 -15 > years > in a similar vein, i have heard about a release (possibly by a couple, not > sure) that recorded the humming from telephone wires, or the actual boxes > on the telephone poles and then slowed it way down and amplified it. i > know this is vague, but i am guessing someone might know what i am talking > about. if so, please send any info to me/list. > > cl >