179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #561

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-03-06 12:08Jeremy A.Smith (idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #561
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-03-06 12:08Jeremy A.Smith> The biggest myth about the longevity of CDs & CDRs is that the playing > side is the mos
From:
Jeremy A.Smith
To:
Date:
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 12:08:46 -0000
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #561
permalink · <E10JJi0-00053t-00@pa.scotland.net>
quoted 3 lines The biggest myth about the longevity of CDs & CDRs is that the playing> The biggest myth about the longevity of CDs & CDRs is that the playing > side is the most important side to protect. Not true - scratches are so > far away from the pits that they are out of focus to the laser.
Yup.
quoted 4 lines scratches, though). The side that's much more prone to damage is the> scratches, though). The side that's much more prone to damage is the > label side, which is protected by a thin coat of lacquer and whatever ink > is printed on (take care w/ those AB3's!), or in the case of better > quality CDRs, a coat of teflon or other protective coating
In this month's Future Music there's mention of a CD-R which has a *ceramic* label-side. Mmm, now that's tough.
quoted 4 lines I'm a firm believer in personal experience. I try stuff myself when> I'm a firm believer in personal experience. I try stuff myself when > possible, and when I can't, I avoid quoting impressionable idiots who > repeat every old wives tale they hear. And I try to do at least some > basic fact-checking. Cyanoacrylate? Sheesh!
Good post, but go a little easy - as long as there's someone to correct any untruths, no harm done. Jeremy.