179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Re: Reich Remixed

3 messages · 2 participants · spans 38 days · search this subject
1999-03-01 16:40nils (idm) Re: Reich Remixed
1999-04-08 17:04(idm) Re: Reich Remixed
1999-04-08 17:04(idm) Re: Reich Remixed
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-03-01 16:40nils"Zenon M. Feszczak" <feszczak@sas.upenn.edu> wrote: > Hello - > > Has anyone heard this ye
From:
nils
To:
Date:
Mon, 01 Mar 1999 16:40:14 +0000
Subject:
(idm) Re: Reich Remixed
permalink · <36DAC2EE.F504AC2C@frodo.mgh.harvard.edu>
"Zenon M. Feszczak" <feszczak@sas.upenn.edu> wrote:
quoted 8 lines Hello -> Hello - > > Has anyone heard this yet: > Reich Remixed > > Apparently remixes of Steve Reich's experimental oddness by the likes of > Coldcut/Howie B/Parker/D*Note > Mantronik/DJ Spooky/Ishii
Yes. I thought it was quite good. Here's a review I wrote on the subject. -Nils No modern classical composer has impacted today’s electronic music as much as Steve Reich. His music uses repetition and texture to build up vast images from tiny blocks of sound. Since so much of electronica relies upon this type of construction, Reich has long been popular in the genre. Uniformly accessible and distinctive in sound, Reich has been a rich source for samples and ideas alike. On *Reich Remixed, well-known compositions like "Music for Eighteen Musicians" and "Electric Counterpoint" endure electronic tweaking and effects by a slough of electronic pioneers, including Coldcut, Howie B., and DJ Spooky. As a tribute to Reich’s contributions, this collection does him justice. Through the use of overlaid beats and voice samples, these musicians endow Reich’s music with rich texture and polyphony. Andrea Parker’s rendition of "The Four Sections," the highlight of the record, wends its way through dark eerie passages without once deviating from a severe booty-shakin’ groove. Tranquility Bass’s mellow remix of "Electric Counterpoint," on the other hand, projects surreal charm though the addition of chanting vocals and sparse drumbeats. As would be hoped from a various artist collection like this, *Reich Remixed offers enough variety to hold the listener’s attention throughout.
1999-04-08 17:04Janet.Treadaway@v2music.comI forwarded the article from The Independent to a friend of mine (not a member of this lis
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 8 Apr 1999 13:04:51 -0400
Subject:
(idm) Re: Reich Remixed
permalink · <8025674D.005C65DE.00@v2music.com>
I forwarded the article from The Independent to a friend of mine (not a member of this list) who's a big Reich fan. He had some comments that I thought some people might find interesting. Remember I'm just the messenger... <<The idea that any sound could be used to make music was not new. Pierre Schaeffer did it in Paris in 1948 and called it "musique concrete".>> Edgar Varese did it with "Ionization," which used two sirens, some gongs and only two pitched instruments out of a dozen, in 1936. <<The "classical" composers are labelled by the pop world as academic, stuffy and pretentious>> That's a load of crap. Frank Zappa loved Varese; Brian Eno, David Bowie and Robert Fripp loved Reich and Philip Glass years ago. Eno credits Satie for inspiring ambient music. The Beatles surely listened to Bach and Mozart; their producer George Martin certainly did. Dave Edmunds had a hit with a version of Khatchaturian's "Sabre Dance." Jeff Beck had a song called "Beck's Bolero" in the Sixties. There have been many rock operas written -- surely their composers must have admired some classical music. The list goes on and on. We won't even get into Yes and Emerson, Lake and Palmer (because we shouldn't). <<while the "pop" composers are taken seriously by media and cultural studies departments but not at all by the music departments.>> A broad generalization with no backup. "Not at all"? What, did this guy survey every music department in the world? <<Now, more than 30 years after "Revolution 9", there are indications that the two cultures might be negotiating a merger.>> This conveniently omits Frank Zappa's many neo-classical albums as well as side two of David Bowie's album _Low_, which was a direct homage to Reich and Glass. And see the above list of pop/classical crossovers. Also, one album does not constitute broad "indications" of a merger. <<Reich is definitely from the world of "classical" contemporary music; he was trained to write string quartets and symphonies>> No, not "definitely" -- he also received extensive training in Indian, African and Indonesian music which influenced his compositions profoundly. <<He was influenced by the pop music of his time - which for him was the jazz of John Coltrane>> John Coltrane did not make pop music. <<and now pop music is influenced by minimalism.>> "Now"? What about the Velvet Underground, Neu and the Modern Lovers, just to name a few? <<this particular merger of pop and classical seems uneasy; it's not really his music, it doesn't really sound like his, but his name appears on the album sleeve.>> This guy has clearly never heard a remix album before. <<Reich's early pieces sounded like nothing ever heard before: they were extreme, even dangerous>> Dangerous? Please. Nitroglycerin is dangerous. Escaped convicts are dangerous. Steve Reich's music would only be dangerous if it were drowning out a fire alarm. <<on the rare occasions that his music was played on the radio, the switchboards were jammed with complaints.>> The switchboards were actually jammed? _Every_ time it was played? When? Where? Typical Brit hyperbole with no regard for factuality. <<Reich's work doesn't need techno processing because his music has it already.>> I'm not sure what the author means by "techno processing," but whatever it is, Reich's music does not have it.
1999-04-08 17:04Janet.Treadaway@v2music.comI forwarded the article from The Independent to a friend of mine (not a member of this lis
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 8 Apr 1999 13:04:51 -0400
Subject:
(idm) Re: Reich Remixed
permalink · <8025674D.005C9D27.00@v2music.com>
I forwarded the article from The Independent to a friend of mine (not a member of this list) who's a big Reich fan. He had some comments that I thought some people might find interesting. Remember I'm just the messenger... <<The idea that any sound could be used to make music was not new. Pierre Schaeffer did it in Paris in 1948 and called it "musique concrete".>> Edgar Varese did it with "Ionization," which used two sirens, some gongs and only two pitched instruments out of a dozen, in 1936. <<The "classical" composers are labelled by the pop world as academic, stuffy and pretentious>> That's a load of crap. Frank Zappa loved Varese; Brian Eno, David Bowie and Robert Fripp loved Reich and Philip Glass years ago. Eno credits Satie for inspiring ambient music. The Beatles surely listened to Bach and Mozart; their producer George Martin certainly did. Dave Edmunds had a hit with a version of Khatchaturian's "Sabre Dance." Jeff Beck had a song called "Beck's Bolero" in the Sixties. There have been many rock operas written -- surely their composers must have admired some classical music. The list goes on and on. We won't even get into Yes and Emerson, Lake and Palmer (because we shouldn't). <<while the "pop" composers are taken seriously by media and cultural studies departments but not at all by the music departments.>> A broad generalization with no backup. "Not at all"? What, did this guy survey every music department in the world? <<Now, more than 30 years after "Revolution 9", there are indications that the two cultures might be negotiating a merger.>> This conveniently omits Frank Zappa's many neo-classical albums as well as side two of David Bowie's album _Low_, which was a direct homage to Reich and Glass. And see the above list of pop/classical crossovers. Also, one album does not constitute broad "indications" of a merger. <<Reich is definitely from the world of "classical" contemporary music; he was trained to write string quartets and symphonies>> No, not "definitely" -- he also received extensive training in Indian, African and Indonesian music which influenced his compositions profoundly. <<He was influenced by the pop music of his time - which for him was the jazz of John Coltrane>> John Coltrane did not make pop music. <<and now pop music is influenced by minimalism.>> "Now"? What about the Velvet Underground, Neu and the Modern Lovers, just to name a few? <<this particular merger of pop and classical seems uneasy; it's not really his music, it doesn't really sound like his, but his name appears on the album sleeve.>> This guy has clearly never heard a remix album before. <<Reich's early pieces sounded like nothing ever heard before: they were extreme, even dangerous>> Dangerous? Please. Nitroglycerin is dangerous. Escaped convicts are dangerous. Steve Reich's music would only be dangerous if it were drowning out a fire alarm. <<on the rare occasions that his music was played on the radio, the switchboards were jammed with complaints.>> The switchboards were actually jammed? _Every_ time it was played? When? Where? Typical Brit hyperbole with no regard for factuality. <<Reich's work doesn't need techno processing because his music has it already.>> I'm not sure what the author means by "techno processing," but whatever it is, Reich's music does not have it.