179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) "yeah! WHOO!"

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 2 days · search this subject
1998-12-14 15:56Andrew Cowper (idm) "yeah! WHOO!"
└─ 1998-12-16 01:37Mark Stevens Re: (idm) "yeah! WHOO!"
└─ 1998-12-16 19:16eric hill Re: (idm) "yeah! WHOO!"
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-12-14 15:56Andrew Cowper>> i'm NOT kidding, they even left in the "yeah! WHOO!" stuff. pretty cool. >> You know, t
From:
Andrew Cowper
To:
'idm'
Date:
Mon, 14 Dec 1998 10:56:32 -0500
Subject:
(idm) "yeah! WHOO!"
permalink · <01BE2750.697DC670@calvin.dvcorp.com>
quoted 1 line>>
i'm NOT kidding, they even left in the "yeah! WHOO!" stuff. pretty cool.
quoted 1 line>>
You know, there's not nearly enough songs these days that do this. that "yeah whoo!" sample used to be a staple, man. Something you could rely on. It was reassuring. Bring it back! CheersAndrew C. (who's going to listen to Tricky Disco when he gets home tonight. Yeah! Whoo! Yeah! Whoo! Yeah! Whoo! Yeah! Whoo!)
1998-12-16 01:37Mark StevensOn Mon, 14 Dec 1998 10:56:32 -0500, you wrote: >You know, there's not nearly enough songs
From:
Mark Stevens
To:
'idm'
Date:
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 01:37:11 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) "yeah! WHOO!"
Reply to:
(idm) "yeah! WHOO!"
permalink · <36780e66.2082795@post.demon.co.uk>
On Mon, 14 Dec 1998 10:56:32 -0500, you wrote:
quoted 3 lines You know, there's not nearly enough songs these days that do this. that>You know, there's not nearly enough songs these days that do this. that >"yeah whoo!" sample used to be a staple, man. Something you could rely on. >It was reassuring. Bring it back!
I hate to be pedantic... Well, no -- actually I don't. But I always thought it was "whoo yeah!" rather than "yeah whoo!". Under most circumstances, the "whoos" definitely preceded the "yeahs" by a significant margin. /\/)ark http://www.sonance.demon.co.uk/
1998-12-16 19:16eric hill>thought it was "whoo yeah!" rather than "yeah whoo!". Under most >circumstances, the "who
From:
eric hill
To:
'idm'
Date:
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 11:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) "yeah! WHOO!"
Reply to:
Re: (idm) "yeah! WHOO!"
permalink · <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812161114320.25271-100000@shell3.ba.best.com>
quoted 3 lines thought it was "whoo yeah!" rather than "yeah whoo!". Under most>thought it was "whoo yeah!" rather than "yeah whoo!". Under most >circumstances, the "whoos" definitely preceded the "yeahs" by a >significant margin.
it's at _least_ a half a second. you'd be insane to think otherwise. eric onnow: nuno canavarro : plux quba (moikai)