179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) flatbush remixes

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-12-04 21:14Sean Cooper (idm) flatbush remixes
1998-12-04 22:48Jeff Waye/Ninja Tune Re: (idm) flatbush remixes
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-12-04 21:14Sean Coopergot this one in the mail yesterday. i'm mostly agreeing with other accounts, although the
From:
Sean Cooper
To:
Date:
Fri, 4 Dec 1998 13:14:23 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
(idm) flatbush remixes
permalink · <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812041305550.12005-100000@shell7.ba.best.com>
got this one in the mail yesterday. i'm mostly agreeing with other accounts, although the standout track for me has been the trapezoid remix, which is schematic's richard devine. a nice refinement of the style of glitchy computer-beat electro that filled his "richard coleman devine" ep, much less abrassive and easier on the ears. another nice stand-up bassline, as well, and as with the best of that ep a very moving sense of development. subtle but also very intense. the bisk mix is also interesting -- he essentially leaves the vocals in place (which i usually dislike in remixes), but totally rebuilds the rhythm track from the ground up. nicely done. the rest are pleasant enough, but hardly worth the attention of a big licensed remix project thingy. seems like the mid-level indie electronica scene is beginning to fall for its own hype (vvm/diskono as a wire cover story; ninja licensing a very samey comp from a "hot" indie label). maybe i'm just out of touch... oh, and i actually found the autechre and squarepusher mixes a bit on the boring side. sc
1998-12-04 22:48Jeff Waye/Ninja Tune>but hardly worth >the attention of a big licensed remix project thingy. seems like the >m
From:
Jeff Waye/Ninja Tune
To:
Date:
Fri, 4 Dec 98 18:48:00 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) flatbush remixes
permalink · <199812042347.SAA11881@bigbang.Generation.NET>
quoted 5 lines but hardly worth>but hardly worth >the attention of a big licensed remix project thingy. seems like the >mid-level indie electronica scene is beginning to fall for its own >hype (vvm/diskono as a wire cover story; ninja licensing a very samey >comp from a "hot" indie label). maybe i'm just out of touch...
Maybe I'm out of touch, but Wire has hardly ever struck me as a big magazine of the putting people on the cover to sell ads variety. I figure putting the VVM folks on the cover is about as over the top commercial as when they put Steve Stapleton on the cover. Much like us licensing the E.F.B release from Chocolate Industries, there's really no 'big' commercial interest involved here. We all thought the original was wicked, and that it would be a good idea to license whatever Chocolate Industries came up with (plus it helps get the C.Industries name out there a bit). You might be reading a little to much into what is essentially just a low-key release that we (as in Ninja and C.Industries) all liked. Anyway, no offense taken, I think some people just assume we're a hell of a lot bigger then we really are. I thought the Squarepusher mix was the best one. I liked the weird double time thing he did with the vocal. Also the Freeform one I thought was particularly excellent. See Ya Jeff