179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #399

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) plaid - scoobs in columbia · (idm) re: idm-digest v2 #399
1998-11-03 17:40Simon Walley (idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #399
├─ 1998-11-03 17:55-nick^w- Re: (idm) Plaid - Scoobs in Columbia
└─ 1998-11-04 04:56Irene McC Re: (idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #399
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-11-03 17:40Simon Walley>From: mark@sonance.demon.co.uk (Mark Stevens) >Subject: Re: (idm) Plaid - Scoobs in Colum
From:
Simon Walley
To:
Date:
Tue, 03 Nov 1998 09:40:48 PST
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #399
permalink · <19981103174049.9285.qmail@hotmail.com>
quoted 5 lines From: mark@sonance.demon.co.uk (Mark Stevens)>From: mark@sonance.demon.co.uk (Mark Stevens) >Subject: Re: (idm) Plaid - Scoobs in Columbia > >It's not the best Plaid, >merely a cheesey techno/house track
Eh?!? Not at all. A classic. Heard it played out the other weekend at some jazzy house club - proper IDM in the sense that it makes you want to dance like an idiot. And its smooth and funky to nod to at home.
quoted 6 lines From: mark@sonance.demon.co.uk (Mark Stevens)>From: mark@sonance.demon.co.uk (Mark Stevens) >Subject: Re: (idm) Plaid - "Not For Threes" > >Not at all! I just think it's strange that some people in this list >refuse to listen to anything that contains vocals (or a song) or >acoustic instruments.
Its not strange at all. I won't listen to any 4/4 stuff that thunders along at about 200BPM although I'm sure there are (somewhere...) some gabber tracks that might border on the innovative or intelligent. The Bjork vocal debate is different - its not whether vocals are 'good' or not in IDM, its whether people like her very distinctive voice or not. Horses for courses innit. And again:
quoted 5 lines From: mark@sonance.demon.co.uk (Mark Stevens)>From: mark@sonance.demon.co.uk (Mark Stevens) >Subject: Re: (idm) Plaid - "Not For Threes" > >And then some. I couldn't wait for Babylon -- then Warp dropped it >because it didn't quite fit in with their master plan. Arses.
What master plan is this? Warp release the music they like (and, of course, are keen to see each record they sell do well). End of story. They didn't like it. They didn't release it.
quoted 6 lines From: Michael Upton <username@sans.vuw.ac.nz>>From: Michael Upton <username@sans.vuw.ac.nz> >Subject: Re: (idm) Plaid - "Not For Threes" > >Oh yeah, and while I still hate 'Music for >Adverts', I do think Plaid's production etc. is >quite over the top on the "nice and clear" front.
Yup. I love _Not for Threes_ but it is over-produced and ultra-squeaky clean, at times to the detriment of the music. Still a great album though IMHO. || [CiM] || cim_@hotmail.com || - ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
1998-11-03 17:55-nick^w-> Yup. I love _Not for Threes_ but it is over-produced and ultra-squeaky > clean, at times
From:
-nick^w-
To:
Date:
Tue, 3 Nov 1998 17:55:15 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Plaid - Scoobs in Columbia
Reply to:
(idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #399
permalink · <14358D2152E@fs2.scg.man.ac.uk>
quoted 3 lines Yup. I love _Not for Threes_ but it is over-produced and ultra-squeaky> Yup. I love _Not for Threes_ but it is over-produced and ultra-squeaky > clean, at times to the detriment of the music. Still a great album > though IMHO.
I'd extend this to stuff by Orbital - just a bit too Gary Lineker. Nick
1998-11-04 04:56Irene McCOn 3 Nov 98, Simon Walley wrote re: (idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #399: > proper IDM in the sens
From:
Irene McC
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 4 Nov 1998 06:56:54 +0200
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #399
Reply to:
(idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #399
permalink · <E0zav06-000274-00@smtp03.iafrica.com>
On 3 Nov 98, Simon Walley wrote re: (idm) Re: idm-digest V2 #399:
quoted 2 lines proper IDM in the sense that it makes you want to dance> proper IDM in the sense that it makes you want to dance > like an idiot.
Oh terriffic ! this should go in the FAQ as the true identity of IDM. And what is EBM? Somebody today classified his musical direction as such - clarifying my quizzical look with "Electro Body Music". Is that poles apart from IDM? And who was polling / compiling whether we do or don't dance? Any answers available yet? Or do you all have lead legs? I *