179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Check the Emanated comp cd...

3 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-10-08 18:21Lance C McGannon (idm) Check the Emanated comp cd...
└─ 1998-10-08 18:50Sam Frank Re: (idm) Check the Emanated comp cd...
└─ 1998-10-08 18:51Lance C McGannon Re: (idm) Check the Emanated comp cd...
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-10-08 18:21Lance C McGannonJust got a breathtaking new compilation cd in the mail today from a new label called Emina
From:
Lance C McGannon
To:
Intelligent Dance Music Mailing List
Date:
Thu, 08 Oct 1998 14:21:18 -0400
Subject:
(idm) Check the Emanated comp cd...
permalink · <Version.32.19981008131339.00f3b390@mail.nacs.net>
Just got a breathtaking new compilation cd in the mail today from a new label called Eminate. The comp features nine tracks of unique abstract electronica much different from the slew of warp, musik aus strom, skam, markant-type stuff that seems to be everywhere these days. Artists on this comp include Lillanthal, OST, if.then.else, Sybarite, and Solenoid. This comp is highly recommended for those who like their idm with a twist but still very accessible. Imagine the old ART/B12 material mixed with some Freeform, Roupe, OST and even a little Vulva. Very impressive stuff... Full review soon. btw: i would like to apologize to the list for not being as regular with my recoreviews. i've been very busy lately with non-music related stuffs. i hope to get back on a regular recoreview posting schedule sometime next week. that is, unless my reviews are considered worthless and stupid as recent discussions on this list have let me to believe. -->-Lance--- p.o. box 450715 westlake, ohio 44145 united states
1998-10-08 18:50Sam Frank> i hope >to get back on a regular recoreview >posting schedule sometime next week. >that
From:
Sam Frank
To:
Lance C McGannon , Intelligent Dance Music Mailing List
Date:
Thu, 08 Oct 1998 14:50:46 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) Check the Emanated comp cd...
Reply to:
(idm) Check the Emanated comp cd...
permalink · <199810081846.OAA21013@pantheon-po03.its.yale.edu>
quoted 6 lines i hope> i hope >to get back on a regular recoreview >posting schedule sometime next week. >that is, unless my reviews are considered >worthless and stupid as recent discussions >on this list have let me to believe.
Damn, your reviews are one of the best resources on this list. Yes, they're short, since you do so many, but they're descriptive without being schematic, they evoke some good imagery, and they add a lot of info about good music that would otherwise not be discussed on this list. Maybe I'd like a little more clarification of your numbered ranking system, because you'll often pan something but then give it a 6/10 or something. Do you not review the really bad stuff you hear? Would you say 8 and up is "very good", and 9-10 is essential? But please, keep posting reviews... Sam
1998-10-08 18:51Lance C McGannonAt 02:50 PM 10/8/98 -0400, you wrote: >> i hope >>to get back on a regular recoreview >>po
From:
Lance C McGannon
To:
Sam Frank
Cc:
Intelligent Dance Music Mailing List
Date:
Thu, 08 Oct 1998 14:51:52 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) Check the Emanated comp cd...
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Check the Emanated comp cd...
permalink · <199810081855.OAA00832@devel.nacs.net>
At 02:50 PM 10/8/98 -0400, you wrote:
quoted 13 lines i hope>> i hope >>to get back on a regular recoreview >>posting schedule sometime next week. >>that is, unless my reviews are considered >>worthless and stupid as recent discussions >>on this list have let me to believe. > >Damn, your reviews are one of the best resources on this list. >Yes, they're short, since you do so many, but they're descriptive >without being schematic, they evoke some good imagery, and >they add a lot of info about good music that would otherwise not >be discussed on this list. Maybe I'd like a little more clarification >of
your numbered ranking system, because you'll often pan
quoted 5 lines something but then give it a 6/10 or something. Do you not>something but then give it a 6/10 or something. Do you not >review the really bad stuff you hear? Would you say 8 and up is >"very good", and 9-10 is essential? But please, keep posting >reviews... >
Regarding my ranking system, you usually don't see me pan releases because i buy most of the stuff i review. i usually don't buy the bad stuff so you don't see those reviews. regarding the value of the numbering system, i may give something a 6/10 because it's not all that bad but i know the artist has done much better, etc; 7/10 is decent to good; 8/10 is very good; 9-10 is essential. anything 5 or below should be approaced with great caution or avoided alltogether. -->-Lance--- p.o. box 450715 westlake, ohio 44145 united states