179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Word On New Skam

7 messages · 7 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-09-24 11:20jif Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
1998-09-24 21:34(idm) Word On New Skam
└─ 1998-09-24 22:28multsanta Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
└─ 1998-09-24 22:35Brett McCormick Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
├─ 1998-09-24 22:43zimbo Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
└─ 1998-09-24 22:53Greg Clow Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
└─ 1998-09-24 23:20eric Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-09-24 11:20jif>> It's just another crappy SKAM record which will be overhyped by the >> IDM list due to
From:
jif
To:
Date:
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 07:20:39 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
permalink · <3.0.5.32.19980924072039.007b3e30@comnet.ca>
quoted 2 lines It's just another crappy SKAM record which will be overhyped by the>> It's just another crappy SKAM record which will be overhyped by the >> IDM list due to its limitedness, everyone will buy it, and 90%
you presomptuous mortal.... we of canada know the secret behind skam000, and i might be tempted to divulge it at an appropriate time, for the right price (ie --- if you get siliconvortex to acknowledge my bids)... which is unlikely, so youll find out when flies out the mill... jif
1998-09-24 21:34Discreets@aol.comNew SKAM = Skam 000 (ohhh!?!) New Gescom 12" New Bola Cd / Lp MASK 300 ...in your hands so
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 17:34:57 EDT
Subject:
(idm) Word On New Skam
permalink · <22afdb85.360abb01@aol.com>
New SKAM = Skam 000 (ohhh!?!) New Gescom 12" New Bola Cd / Lp MASK 300 ...in your hands soon! Upcoming Skam = New Push Button Objects 12" MASK 500 ...in your hands not as soon! discreetly, lb
1998-09-24 22:28multsantaAt 05:34 PM 9/24/98 EDT, Discreets@aol.com wrote: >New SKAM = > >Skam 000 (ohhh!?!) >Ahh..
From:
multsanta
To:
,
Date:
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 18:28:33 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
Reply to:
(idm) Word On New Skam
permalink · <3.0.1.32.19980924182833.00726210@m7.sprynet.com>
At 05:34 PM 9/24/98 EDT, Discreets@aol.com wrote:
quoted 3 lines New SKAM =>New SKAM = > >Skam 000 (ohhh!?!)
quoted 4 lines Ahh...>Ahh... > >well, the good news is that it's actually limited to 250 copies! >and the bad news is that nobody's gonna be HEARING it, ever!
so... what exactly is this? can anyone at all offer any information at all? ml/vn// [o{st}m.rec]
1998-09-24 22:35Brett McCormickIt's just another crappy SKAM record which will be overhyped by the IDM list due to its li
From:
Brett McCormick
To:
multsanta
Cc:
,
Date:
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:35:53 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
permalink · <199809242235.PAA06353@eidolon.muppetlabs.com>
It's just another crappy SKAM record which will be overhyped by the IDM list due to its limitedness, everyone will buy it, and 90% of them will think its crap but be afraid to speak up since everyone else seems to like it so much. Then they'll start auctioning it off for hundereds of dollars. Same old same old, pretty much. On Thu, 24 September 1998, at 18:28:33, multsanta@sprynet.com wrote:
quoted 6 lines so... what exactly is this?> > so... what exactly is this? > can anyone at all offer any information at all? > > ml/vn// > [o{st}m.rec]
1998-09-24 22:43zimboOn Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Brett McCormick wrote: > It's just another crappy SKAM record which w
From:
zimbo
To:
Brett McCormick
Cc:
multsanta , ,
Date:
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.96.980924154032.10736E-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Brett McCormick wrote:
quoted 5 lines It's just another crappy SKAM record which will be overhyped by the> It's just another crappy SKAM record which will be overhyped by the > IDM list due to its limitedness, everyone will buy it, and 90% of them > will think its crap but be afraid to speak up since everyone else > seems to like it so much. Then they'll start auctioning it off for > hundereds of dollars. Same old same old, pretty much.
im curious what skam releases you thought were crap.. i was into about 3/4 of the skampler.. and like everything i have, but i dont have but half of it.. if that.. personally, at the moment i really like skam and schematic, i think MAS stuff is good, but a little over-hyped and not too too essential (though im really into the freeform stuff, and m. fakecsh seems to do some really good tracks).. otherwise i find myself mainly sticking to the more post-industrial/experimental sounding idm related stuff. just curious, chris.
1998-09-24 22:53Greg ClowOn Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Brett McCormick wrote: > > so... what exactly is this? > > can anyone
From:
Greg Clow
To:
Date:
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 18:53:26 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
permalink · <Pine.BSI.3.96r.980924185220.13979F-100000@shell1.interlog.com>
On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Brett McCormick wrote:
quoted 8 lines so... what exactly is this?> > so... what exactly is this? > > can anyone at all offer any information at all? > > It's just another crappy SKAM record which will be overhyped by the > IDM list due to its limitedness, everyone will buy it, and 90% of them > will think its crap but be afraid to speak up since everyone else > seems to like it so much. Then they'll start auctioning it off for > hundereds of dollars. Same old same old, pretty much.
Wrong. :) Greg ("I know a seeee-cret! And I'm not tell-ing you!")
1998-09-24 23:20eric> Greg > ("I know a seeee-cret! And I'm not tell-ing you!") how appropriate that the "old
From:
eric
To:
Date:
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 16:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Word On New Skam
permalink · <199809242320.QAA25224@shell3.ba.best.com>
quoted 2 lines Greg> Greg > ("I know a seeee-cret! And I'm not tell-ing you!")
how appropriate that the "old timer's thread" recurs alongside the well-worn practice of obviously holding back info. i don't know why i have to say this, but it's not a secret if you have to tell people you have it. apparently someone's ego needs to be stroked before intentional leaks can be birthed, but this cat doesn't own any kneepads. eric