179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) HR16 bollocks or not bollocks

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-07-30 14:10WARD Giles (idm) HR16 bollocks or not bollocks
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-07-30 14:10WARD Giles> I don't have anything against it. The 'crappy' part comes from the > muziq > habit of ov
From:
WARD Giles
To:
'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Thu, 30 Jul 1998 15:10:06 +0100
Subject:
(idm) HR16 bollocks or not bollocks
permalink · <199807301416.PAA24457@gateway1.sema.co.uk>
quoted 13 lines I don't have anything against it. The 'crappy' part comes from the> I don't have anything against it. The 'crappy' part comes from the > muziq > habit of overloading the mixer inputs, and EQ'ing out anything below > 500khz. > > Though I'd have to say the HR16 kicks need a lot of help. Which goes > to the next muziq hr 16 habit of running through a fuzz pedal, > sampling > it into the FZ-1 and diddling the filter on it. > > Some of the ride cymbals on the Jega album sound like he sampled them > off of "Bluff Limbo." >
Whatever.. you can't argue with the fact that early Mu-ziq is one of the best examples of making the most of limited kit. Deconstructing how a track was made just spoils it for me now. If people want to talk techy there's always the Moveable Parts list.