179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: (idm) the next big IDM label

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-06-26 19:19giLly&KERi Re: (idm) the next big IDM label
1998-06-26 22:51jif (idm) the next big IDM label
1998-06-27 02:55Jason McCollum Re: (idm) the next big IDM label
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-06-26 19:19giLly&KERi> > ...is apparently Matador, for they are currently boasting, in addition to > the BOC de
From:
giLly&KERi
To:
Cc:
,
Date:
Fri, 26 Jun 1998 19:19:58 +0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) the next big IDM label
permalink · <3593F45E.7776@earthlink.net>
quoted 3 lines ...is apparently Matador, for they are currently boasting, in addition to> > ...is apparently Matador, for they are currently boasting, in addition to > the BOC deal:
Blah!!!!!! I love BOC, but I think their full length LP is overrated. I mean its got some _killer_ tracks, but overall its no big thing. Plus some tracks are terribly too loopy (track 11 for example) And all the little sounds of children bother me. Furthermore all that hype for that fucking 7inch! Geez, poor peeps like PJ had to go thru all that poopoo and then the fucking tracks were on the full-length anyway. just my opinion, I know there's tons who think BOC are GODS. Maybe I will after a few more listens of this "Music...children" but so far I'm not all that interested in it:( g ps: Matador is great label with/without BOC, look at all the cool rock bands on their label- Yo La tego (por ejemplo)
1998-06-26 22:51jif...is apparently Matador, for they are currently boasting, in addition to the BOC deal: >C
From:
jif
To:
Date:
Fri, 26 Jun 1998 18:51:24 -0400
Subject:
(idm) the next big IDM label
permalink · <3.0.5.32.19980626185124.007adb30@comnet.ca>
...is apparently Matador, for they are currently boasting, in addition to the BOC deal:
quoted 7 lines Coming in September: the U.S. debut from BURGER/INK, _Las>Coming in September: the U.S. debut from BURGER/INK, _Las >Vegas_ (licensed from EMI Germany), a collaborative work >from electronic wizards Jorg Burger (Bionaut, The >Modernist, B. Movement) and Mike Ink (_Spex_'s 1997 Artist >of the Year). You may or may not have heard some of their >previous works on the Digitrax International, Profan or Eat- >Raw labels, but you really ought to.
at last theyve got good taste... what was that techno thing that SubPop put out again? jif ------------------------------------------------------------ FS/FT: tons of early rephlex/warp/sabotage and other labels, for sale or trade at http://www.comnet.ca/~se2/.
1998-06-27 02:55Jason McCollumgiLly&KERi wrote: > > > > ...is apparently Matador, for they are currently boasting, in ad
From:
Jason McCollum
To:
Date:
Fri, 26 Jun 1998 21:55:47 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) the next big IDM label
permalink · <35945F2F.86BD4DD5@swt.edu>
giLly&KERi wrote:
quoted 17 lines ...is apparently Matador, for they are currently boasting, in addition to> > > > ...is apparently Matador, for they are currently boasting, in addition to > > the BOC deal: > > Blah!!!!!! I love BOC, but I think their full length LP is overrated. > I mean its got some _killer_ tracks, but overall its no big thing. > Plus some tracks are terribly too loopy (track 11 for example) And all > the little sounds of children bother me. Furthermore all that hype for > that fucking 7inch! Geez, poor peeps like PJ had to go thru all that > poopoo and then the fucking tracks were on the full-length anyway. > just my opinion, I know there's tons who think BOC are GODS. Maybe I > will after a few more listens of this "Music...children" but so far > I'm not all that interested in it:( > > g > ps: Matador is great label with/without BOC, look at all the cool rock > bands on their label- Yo La tego (por ejemplo)
Perhaps you think it is overrated because maybe you can't related to it. For me, I can related to it very much... im not speaking of the psychodelic edge it has, but that i can related to the melodies. I remember reading in an interview that they create melodies that you are familiar with but can't quite place. IMHO, a loopy beat is alright with me if its accompanied by a nice little tune. I enjoy the little voices that creep up here and there on the LP. Especially the Hellinterface track on Mask2. If I dig hard enough, I probably have the original version of "Trapped" somewhere in my collection. Yes, "Aquarius" was on the LP but in a slightly different version. At first, I thought it was the same but after a few listens its quite obvious that it is different than the LP version. As for "Chinook" it was only exclusive to the seven inch. Yeah, before you give it a final stamp of disapproval, try reading some of the interviews to get a better insight to the Boards and what they are trying to acieve, then give it another listen.