IDM Mailing Archive

1998-04-19 18:43Matt Cuttlersorry to cause a ruckus, but... 33 or 45? -mc

From:: Matt Cuttler <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.org>
Date:: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 14:43:07 -0400
Subject:: (idm) third eye foundation/vvm split

sorry to cause a ruckus, but... 33 or 45? -mc

1998-04-19 20:33Lance C. McGannonAt 02:43 PM 4/19/98 -0400, you wrote: > >sorry to cause a ruckus, but... > boy aren't you

From:: Lance C. McGannon <mclance@nacs.net>
To:: Matt Cuttler <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu>
Cc:: Intelligent Dance Music Mailing List <idm@hyperreal.org>
Date:: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 16:33:29 -0400
Subject:: Re: (idm) third eye foundation/vvm split
Reply to:: (idm) third eye foundation/vvm split

At 02:43 PM 4/19/98 -0400, you wrote:

quoted 3 lines sorry to cause a ruckus, but...

> >sorry to cause a ruckus, but... >

boy aren't you a rabble-rouser! : )

quoted 2 lines 33 or 45?

>33 or 45? >

my ears say 45 rpm on both sides. that speed best suits the sonic terriorism of both third eye and v/vm. -->-Lance--- p.o. box 450715 westlake, ohio 44145 united states

1998-04-19 20:27alalan@PO-Box.McGill.CA> From: Matt Cuttler <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu> > Subject: Re: (idm) third eye foundation/

From:: <alalan@PO-Box.McGill.CA>
To:: Matt Cuttler <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu>
Cc:: <idm@hyperreal.org>
Date:: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 20:27:51 +0000
Subject:: Re: (idm) third eye foundation/vvm split

quoted 3 lines From: Matt Cuttler <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu>

> From: Matt Cuttler <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu> > Subject: Re: (idm) third eye foundation/vvm split > To: mult santa <multsanta@juno.com>, idm@hyperreal.org, mclance@nacs.net

quoted 8 lines i don't know about that. i agree with lance about the 45 thing. when i

> i don't know about that. i agree with lance about the 45 thing. when i > originally purchased the record, i thought 33 was the right speed, but > once i heard it on 45 i realized what it really should sound like. check > out the guitar sounds at the end of the 3ef side, sound a lot better at > 45. > > anyone else have any opinions on this? >

I've always found it extremely funny when tracks are released that cause confusion about which speed to play them at...i can't figure out whether this says something good or bad about the music. I guess its neither...just humorous. :) Ali Lalani "When injustice becomes law... Resistance becomes duty." Some montreal protesters

1998-04-19 23:11Matt Cuttlermult santa wrote: > On Sun, 19 Apr 1998 14:43:07 -0400 Matt Cuttler > <mc0189@cnsvax.alban

From:: Matt Cuttler <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu>
To:: mult santa <multsanta@juno.com>, <idm@hyperreal.org>, <mclance@nacs.net>
Date:: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 19:11:28 -0400
Subject:: Re: (idm) third eye foundation/vvm split

mult santa wrote:

quoted 10 lines On Sun, 19 Apr 1998 14:43:07 -0400 Matt Cuttler

> On Sun, 19 Apr 1998 14:43:07 -0400 Matt Cuttler > <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu> writes: > >sorry to cause a ruckus, but... > > > >33 or 45? > > obviously 33. > > the track times are on the sleeve, so just pull out a stopwatch... >

i don't know about that. i agree with lance about the 45 thing. when i originally purchased the record, i thought 33 was the right speed, but once i heard it on 45 i realized what it really should sound like. check out the guitar sounds at the end of the 3ef side, sound a lot better at 45. anyone else have any opinions on this? -mc

1998-04-20 00:07Tony BiedenkappSubject: Re: (idm) third eye foundation/vvm split > > >mult santa wrote: > >> On Sun, 19 A

From:: Tony Biedenkapp <teknocon@flash.net>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.org>
Date:: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 20:07:25 -0400
Subject:: Re: (idm) third eye foundation/vvm split

Subject: Re: (idm) third eye foundation/vvm split

quoted 26 lines mult santa wrote:

> > >mult santa wrote: > >> On Sun, 19 Apr 1998 14:43:07 -0400 Matt Cuttler >> <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu> writes: >> >sorry to cause a ruckus, but... >> > >> >33 or 45? >> >> obviously 33. >> >> the track times are on the sleeve, so just pull out a stopwatch... >> > >i don't know about that. i agree with lance about the 45 thing. when i >originally purchased the record, i thought 33 was the right speed, but >once i heard it on 45 i realized what it really should sound like. check >out the guitar sounds at the end of the 3ef side, sound a lot better at >45. > >anyone else have any opinions on this? > >-mc > >

Agreed. 33 nice...45 so much better. I think that 33 kind of just drags on and on, and with it cranked up. Just gets to the point so much better! Tony