179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Plaid - Not For Threes US release?

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-04-14 21:24Boffin (idm) Plaid - Not For Threes US release?
1998-04-15 05:39Andregurov Re: (idm) Plaid - Not For Threes US release?
└─ 1998-04-15 15:23Brian Gingold Re: (idm) Plaid - Not For Threes US release?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-04-14 21:24BoffinI read a favorable review in Details. It also says it's coming out on Interscope. Next que
From:
Boffin
To:
Date:
Tue, 14 Apr 1998 16:24:09 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Plaid - Not For Threes US release?
permalink · <3.0.3.32.19980414162409.00719314@mtco.com>
I read a favorable review in Details. It also says it's coming out on Interscope. Next question: When? Didn't somebody post that they run the unofficial interscope webpage, maybe I should look there or ask that person? What's the address? Cheers, Rusty
1998-04-15 05:39Andregurovreading CMJ monthly today they briefly reviewed the album but referred to its American inc
From:
Andregurov
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 15 Apr 1998 01:39:35 EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Plaid - Not For Threes US release?
permalink · <993b1a97.35344818@aol.com>
reading CMJ monthly today they briefly reviewed the album but referred to its American incarnation on Nothing as "333" and not "Not for Threes". Any clue as to why this is? Bad Journalism? Or is it to be markedly different from the Warp release? Why four questions in a row? James np: Waldemar Bastos "Pretaluz (blacklight)" Muy excelente! Almost as good non-idm as Terry Callier's "Timepeace"
1998-04-15 15:23Brian GingoldOn Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Andregurov wrote: > reading CMJ monthly today they briefly reviewed t
From:
Brian Gingold
To:
Andregurov
Cc:
,
Date:
Wed, 15 Apr 1998 08:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Plaid - Not For Threes US release?
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Plaid - Not For Threes US release?
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.96.980415081801.29827B-100000@dogbert.ucdavis.edu>
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Andregurov wrote:
quoted 4 lines reading CMJ monthly today they briefly reviewed the album but referred to its> reading CMJ monthly today they briefly reviewed the album but referred to its > American incarnation on Nothing as "333" and not "Not for Threes". Any clue > as to why this is? Bad Journalism? Or is it to be markedly different from > the Warp release? Why four questions in a row?
Probably just bad journalism. There's a design on the coverart that looks like 333 (Not FOUR Threes?). But if they had just looked at the spine, they would have seen that it says "Not for Threes" there. Bye. -Brian ________________________________________________________________________ Brian Gingold, University of California Davis "sound" - kdvs 90.3 fm tuesdays midnight-3am ambient/experimental/idm Web: http://wwwcsif.cs.ucdavis.edu/~gingold