179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Fw: (313) Economics 4 All: LETS TAKE BACK OUR SCENE

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-01-30 17:37IndieRevolt (idm) Fw: (313) Economics 4 All: LETS TAKE BACK OUR SCENE
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-01-30 17:37IndieRevolt> - with the techno market being in the rut it is there should maybe be a > forum for labe
From:
IndieRevolt
To:
,
Cc:
, ,
Date:
Fri, 30 Jan 1998 12:37:00 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Fw: (313) Economics 4 All: LETS TAKE BACK OUR SCENE
permalink · <199801301734.MAA17945@wolf.interlynx.net>
quoted 2 lines - with the techno market being in the rut it is there should maybe be a> - with the techno market being in the rut it is there should maybe be a > forum for labels to bump heads rather than bump egos and then bump sales
at
quoted 3 lines this point in time. n.a. is far from europe is far from asia etc. There> this point in time. n.a. is far from europe is far from asia etc. There > is virtually no internationally marketing for most of the independants. > distributors simply cannot take the risk. in PERFECT COMPETITION we
would
quoted 9 lines plan together as a group. since last year these Major label guys have> plan together as a group. since last year these Major label guys have > tried to monopolize the retail channels that indies find difficult to > access. The adverse trickle down effect is that the independant > distributors and labels are losing not "riding the wave" as the major > labels and their Media attack would like everyone to beleive. > > If these major corporation didnt saturate OUR independant market (the one > belonging to the consumers and the ind. producers) then we would not be > struggling right know for a) retail shelf space b) the consumers
attention
quoted 7 lines and c) distributor wholsale price floors. In our newsletter this month:> and c) distributor wholsale price floors. In our newsletter this month: > ________________ > "1) The year started off with problems collecting last years accounts > receivable from distributers. After talking with the independant > distributers i realized that this last "Electronic-ha" > craze had hurt the independant distributors of underground electronic > music. It seems that many small labels are suffering. I think that most
of
quoted 5 lines us forcasted this but We cannot let "the ship" sink.> us forcasted this but We cannot let "the ship" sink. > > Discussing 1998 for Techno/electronic music with the Larger distributors > only > brought to my dismay their demand to bring onto the label "bigger
artists".
quoted 4 lines I hold strong in any forum that the music and artists on the label from> I hold strong in any forum that the music and artists on the label from > the Regions we represent is strong if not stronger than these other > "bigger > artists" which were prefabed to saturate the mass consumer market. I
stand
quoted 2 lines my ground to say that "We as a collective of innovative> my ground to say that "We as a collective of innovative > artists deserve as much attention and recognition as "big" artists. We
are
quoted 13 lines inovators and not immitators. Those "famous" acts are "acts" and have > inovators and not immitators. Those "famous" acts are "acts" and have and > still do misrepresent us to the masses. they are also giving us a bad > image. > ______________ > > > > > > > > >