179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: (idm) mike slags dmx, etc. (was: bad urmur)

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-01-30 01:48GamePrg. Re: (idm) mike slags dmx, etc. (was: bad urmur)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-01-30 01:48GamePrg.On Friday, 30-Jan-98, mult-- erantmundas.gaptena wrote [about Re: (idm) bad urmur]: >btw,
From:
GamePrg.
To:
IDM
Date:
Fri, 30 Jan 1998 01:48:02 EST4EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) mike slags dmx, etc. (was: bad urmur)
permalink · <yam7334.142.130361832@mail.clark.net>
On Friday, 30-Jan-98, mult-- erantmundas.gaptena wrote [about Re: (idm) bad urmur]:
quoted 2 lines btw, did you see all the rephlex bashing going on in the exp interview??>btw, did you see all the rephlex bashing going on in the exp interview?? >"not even the aphex mix could save it [dmx krew's _fresh]"-mike p.
I agree with him actually :) but then again i'd rather listen to the aphex mix of that than his brace yourself remix ;)
quoted 5 lines but MU-ZIQ's level of quality control didn't lose it until _urmur_...>but MU-ZIQ's level of quality control didn't lose it until _urmur_... >and that >JAKE put a lot of effort into his first album and his tusken raiders >project, but lost it from there.. >GARY, and KID never really had any quality control what-so-ever..
From talking to Mike P. when he came to modern music, it seemed to me he had quite a good sense of quality control. but I dunno really after some releases. __ __\ \ / /_\ \ \_____/ www.freq-div.home.ml.org