179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-01-16 19:20not UV active (idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist
└─ 1998-01-16 19:34Ashok Divakaran RE: (idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist
1998-01-17 02:07Re: (idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-01-16 19:20not UV activeIrene C. sez> <On the other hand, if you come to it later as a newcomer, you may still app
From:
not UV active
To:
Date:
Fri, 16 Jan 1998 11:20:20 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
(idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist
permalink · <01ISFYLDOOAO8WWJDS@POMONA.EDU>
Irene C. sez> <On the other hand, if you come to it later as a newcomer, you may still appreciate its musicality or originality *for its time* but you may never truly live that music or have it engrained into your bloodstream the way you will with music that forms part of your growing and evolving experience. If I had the time, motivation, or words, I'd assert that there are different ways to come to experience music... radio, dancefloor, dub-on-tape-from-friend -- and they're all valid and significant. Is it not possible to come to experience music from the past and still *truly live* the music and have it engrained in your bloodstream? For me, as silly as I think it is, oldschool breakbeat is definitely engrained in my bloodstream, in brain, whatever, and it was old news a long time before I had ever heard any of it. Especially in a culture that recycles stuff, it's never clear when something is dead... it ALL forms part of my growing and evolving experience: the new, the old, _'cause it's all new_ to me, till I listen to it over and over again. Don't choke, k.
1998-01-16 19:34Ashok Divakaran> Irene C. sez> > > > it later as a newcomer, you may still appreciate its musicality or >
From:
Ashok Divakaran
To:
Date:
Fri, 16 Jan 1998 19:34:36 +0000 (GMT)
Subject:
RE: (idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist
Reply to:
(idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist
permalink · <"A1864ZXFASZWOW*/R=WBWASH/R=A1/U=ASHOK DIVAKARAN/"@MHS>
quoted 15 lines Irene C. sez>> Irene C. sez> > > > it later as a newcomer, you may still appreciate its musicality or > originality *for its time* but you may never truly live that music or > have it engrained into your bloodstream the way you will with > music that forms part of your growing and evolving experience. > > > If I had the time, motivation, or words, I'd assert that there are different > ways to come to experience music... radio, dancefloor, dub-on-tape-from-friend > -- and they're all valid and significant. > > Is it not possible to come to experience music from the past and still *truly > live* the music and have it engrained in your bloodstream?
Yes, it is, but not quite in the same way. Anyone who still plays Howard Jones (I plead guilty - only on occasion, though) without blushing will know what I mean :-) Ashok
1998-01-17 02:07tweibrecht@juno.comOn Fri, 16 Jan 1998 19:34:36 +0000 (GMT) Ashok Divakaran <adivakaran@worldbank.org> writes
From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 16 Jan 1998 21:07:05 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist
permalink · <19980117.210701.16191.2.tweibrecht@juno.com>
On Fri, 16 Jan 1998 19:34:36 +0000 (GMT) Ashok Divakaran <adivakaran@worldbank.org> writes:
quoted 28 lines Irene C. sez>>> Irene C. sez> >> >> >> it later as a newcomer, you may still appreciate its musicality or >> originality *for its time* but you may never truly live that music >or >> have it engrained into your bloodstream the way you will with >> music that forms part of your growing and evolving experience. >> >> >> If I had the time, motivation, or words, I'd assert that there are >different >> ways to come to experience music... radio, dancefloor, >dub-on-tape-from-friend >> -- and they're all valid and significant. >> >> Is it not possible to come to experience music from the past and >still *truly >> live* the music and have it engrained in your bloodstream? > >Yes, it is, but not quite in the same way. Anyone who still plays >Howard >Jones (I plead guilty - only on occasion, though) without blushing >will know >what I mean :-) > >Ashok >
...or berlin.... np: dont ask.... tom w