179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Luke Slater *Freek Funk*

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-10-29 01:35Matt Cuttler (idm) Luke Slater *Freek Funk*
└─ 1997-10-29 03:32Lance C. McGannon Re: (idm) Luke Slater *Freek Funk*
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-10-29 01:35Matt CuttlerI just purchased this album and was wondering what the other listers thought about it? To
From:
Matt Cuttler
To:
idm@hyperreal.org
Date:
Tue, 28 Oct 1997 20:35:15 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Luke Slater *Freek Funk*
permalink · <345692D2.B8359786@cnsvax.albany.edu>
I just purchased this album and was wondering what the other listers thought about it? To me it sounds a little dated.. Maybe it would of blew my mind 4 years ago.. By no means is it bad, but it doesn't really do much for me... Any opinions? -mc
1997-10-29 03:32Lance C. McGannonAt 08:35 PM 10/28/97 -0500, you wrote: > >I just purchased this album and was wondering wh
From:
Lance C. McGannon
To:
Matt Cuttler
Cc:
Intelligent Dance Music Mailing List
Date:
Tue, 28 Oct 1997 22:32:44 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) Luke Slater *Freek Funk*
Reply to:
(idm) Luke Slater *Freek Funk*
permalink · <3.0.3.32.19971028223244.006af1a0@nacs.net>
At 08:35 PM 10/28/97 -0500, you wrote:
quoted 9 lines I just purchased this album and was wondering what the other listers> >I just purchased this album and was wondering what the other listers >thought about it? >To me it sounds a little dated.. Maybe it would of blew my mind 4 years >ago.. By no means is it bad, but it doesn't really do much for me... >Any opinions? > >-mc >
I really enjoy it. Lost of different styles spread over 16 tracks - techno, idm, electro, ambient. I'm not sure what you mean by calling it dated. I'll admit that it's not breaking any new musical grounds but each of the tracks excell in the musical styles they're produced in. I'd give it an 8/10. -->-Lance--- p.o. box 450715 westlake, ohio 44145 united states