179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) FS Bradley's Beat Rephlex 001

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 4 days · search this subject
1997-10-24 03:49michael (idm) FS Bradley's Beat Rephlex 001
└─ 1997-10-27 21:27Ben Coffer Re: (idm) FS Bradley's Beat Rephlex 001
└─ 1997-10-28 01:51Greg Clow Re: (idm) FS Bradley's Beat Rephlex 001
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-10-24 03:49michaelGreetings. I am not a subscriber to IDM (not enough time to read mail) but i have myself a
From:
michael
To:
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 1997 23:49:23 -0400
Subject:
(idm) FS Bradley's Beat Rephlex 001
permalink · <34501AC3.D7A@techno.ca>
Greetings. I am not a subscriber to IDM (not enough time to read mail) but i have myself a copy of this record in near pristine condition that i would be interested in selling. If anyone wants it, please email to me your bid. Thanks.
1997-10-27 21:27Ben CofferIn message <34501AC3.D7A@techno.ca>, michael <polyphonic@techno.ca> writes >Greetings. > >
From:
Ben Coffer
To:
Date:
Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:27:23 +0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) FS Bradley's Beat Rephlex 001
Reply to:
(idm) FS Bradley's Beat Rephlex 001
permalink · <zIbnTJA7cQV0EwGc@hybridgame.demon.co.uk>
In message <34501AC3.D7A@techno.ca>, michael <polyphonic@techno.ca> writes
quoted 5 lines Greetings.>Greetings. > >I am not a subscriber to IDM (not enough time to read mail) but i have >myself a copy of this record in near pristine condition that i would be >interested in selling. If anyone wants it, please email to me your bid.
Ah, but is part#2 the *real* part#2 ? :) -- Ben Coffer Hybrid Productions http://www.hybridgame.demon.co.uk/
1997-10-28 01:51Greg ClowOn Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Ben Coffer wrote: > >I am not a subscriber to IDM (not enough time to
From:
Greg Clow
To:
Date:
Mon, 27 Oct 1997 20:51:58 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) FS Bradley's Beat Rephlex 001
Reply to:
Re: (idm) FS Bradley's Beat Rephlex 001
permalink · <Pine.BSI.3.95.971027205004.21888B-100000@shell1.interlog.com>
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Ben Coffer wrote:
quoted 5 lines I am not a subscriber to IDM (not enough time to read mail) but i have> >I am not a subscriber to IDM (not enough time to read mail) but i have > >myself a copy of this record in near pristine condition that i would be > >interested in selling. If anyone wants it, please email to me your bid. > > Ah, but is part#2 the *real* part#2 ? :)
Can someone explain this "two different Part Twos" thing to me? I've had a couple of people ask me which version of this record that I'm selling in my Rephlex auction and since I've only ever seen/heard/owned one of them, I don't really know what to tell them. Greg PS: The auction is at http://www.interlog.com/~stained/rephlex.txt