well, first off - we count on you being smarter than
your mailer. second of all, we also count on you
looking things over and making sure you mean what
you wrote/are sending it to the right address.
beyond that, we can't help. that means the 'fucking
autoreply' isn't the problem, sugarbritches. just so
you feel better: this is also a problem on a work-related
forum i'm on, and the results aren't much better.
sigh,
s.
ps: to catch up on some content, since i should probably
contribute SOMETHING ---
- arovane and aspen are two current favorites; such moodiness,
such lush tone qualities. gorgeous.
- i'm also loving the boulder dash cd though i'm not sure *why*
- the vibert/mu-ziq show in seattle was top notch; so, for
that matter, was elliott smith.
- skam needs to straighten up & get some qa in there. jesus.
- everyone should rent 'orgazmo' and have a good giggle
- the i-f mix cd is a lot of fun and everyone should check it out
- when speaking of brian eno in hushed tones, let's not forget
gems like 'baby's on fire' (which i adore).
- mp3s are great as a taster, but a poor second to owning an actual work
- i'm not catholic, but i'll give up grousing for lent (NOT
giving up macmame, mind you, just grousing).
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, you wrote:
quoted 2 lines only 1 out of those 3 posts was supposed to go to the list. what the
> only 1 out of those 3 posts was supposed to go to the list. what the
> hell is it with that fucking autoreply???