179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)

10 messages · 10 participants · spans 6 days · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) aphex/autechre/gear · (idm) aphex/autechre/gear (response to dipwank)
1997-09-01 06:28Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
├─ 1997-08-31 19:31Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
└─ 1997-09-06 13:44GamePrg. Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
1997-09-01 18:02Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
└─ 1997-09-01 22:19wells Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
└─ 1997-09-02 03:57Oblique Hostility Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
└─ 1997-09-02 02:14Nate Harrison [Digital Magician Inc] Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
└─ 1997-09-02 20:08Random Junk Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
1997-09-03 13:39Robert R. Stewart Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
└─ 1997-09-03 13:47soul whirling somewhere Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-09-01 06:28Biostream@aol.comIn a message dated 97-08-31 13:42:05 EDT, you write: Listen you CUNT!!!!! I was talking ab
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 1 Sep 1997 02:28:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <970901022818_547606587@emout01.mail.aol.com>
In a message dated 97-08-31 13:42:05 EDT, you write: Listen you CUNT!!!!! I was talking about a fucking computer with no add ons! Of course you can soup up your computer you fuck up, what the fuck do you think RDJ works with! But if you're just gunna take your basic Home PC then it's a whole other fucking story!!!!!!!! You flame me for all this stupid shit but you don't realize that I was talking about how many add ons you'll need to buy before you're computer will be up to professional abilities. Like the fucking Zip Drive, Jazz Drive, Sample Cell, etc. Oh and another thing, if you think your gunna try to use floppy disks to store your audio then you're the most dipwanklyest Cunt around! Think before you FLAME!!!!! Shithead!!!!! -Biostream << >The advantage of samplers is that even though computers can do everything and >more that samplers can do, samplers are much much more faster. "much much more faster." ? Two words: Macintosh. SampleCell <<~~~~~ You've got to buy these things fuckboy, they just don't grow on your ass one day. Just as fast, if not faster than any dedicated sampler. <~~~ you seem to know jack shit about samplers >Another thing is you don't have to worry about your hard drive filling up, proccessing >power, and most importantly sound quality. Bollocks ! Some more words for you: Floppy Disk. <~~~~~???? What buttfuckery is this? Zip. Jaz. How much space do you need ? Works fine for me, I have three albums in progress on my drives at the moment. Yeah, shithead, and you had to BUY those things. In the end you end up paying just as much as you would for a sampler. >A sound card is not designed for professional sampling SampleCell is just that. <~~~ of course you can just wait for it to grow on your ass. > if you're going to do it straight computer, like RDJ does now, you've got to get a very good >audio interface to go with that wonderful soundcard that will also cost you another few hundred >dollars. Simple fact of life: If you want professional sound. Be professional and use professional equipment. Yeah, you've gotta buy it first though. >you'll have to also buy a special type of audio interface to cut noise between whatever you're sampling >and the sound card which also requires expensive software. Eh ? >You'll need to get a good sound editing program, something like CoolEdit >or Goldwave ( I think cooledit is better, but that's just my opinion) Just buy a damned Mac and play with the big boys. Macs are just as good, but there is no "better" computer. >You'll need a fast fucking computer with a fuckload of RAM. Not true. >RDJ himself uses 4 powerpc macs, along with a bunch of interfaces, and alot of add ons. Who cares what RDJ uses ? One PowerMac will do. It doesn't even have to be a PowerMac, a standard Mac will work just fine. I think you need to come back down from "buttfuck my brain" land. Don't bother posting until you know what you're talking about "Biostream". There's too much opinion presented as fact on the net. I can't stand all this ill-informed crap. I'd like to fucking stick my foot down your throught. =D To answer the original question, when they're working entirely on computer for audio,, most pros use a Mac with ProTools and/or SampleCell. B. >>
1997-08-31 19:31sanvara@gte.netAt 02:28 AM 9/1/97 -0400, Biostream@aol.com wrote: >Listen you CUNT!!!!! I was talking abo
From:
To:
Date:
Sun, 31 Aug 1997 12:31:27 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <3.0.3.32.19970831123127.0070c518@mail.gte.net>
At 02:28 AM 9/1/97 -0400, Biostream@aol.com wrote: >Listen you CUNT!!!!! I was talking about a fucking computer with no add ons!
quoted 2 lines Of course you can soup up your computer you fuck up, what the fuck do you>Of course you can soup up your computer you fuck up, what the fuck do you >think RDJ works with!
If I were the admin on this mailing list I'd ban these type of abusive people permanently.
1997-09-06 13:44GamePrg.On Monday, 01-Sep-97, Biostream@aol.com wrote [about Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Respon
From:
GamePrg.
To:
Cc:
IDM
Date:
Sat, 06 Sep 1997 13:44:43 EST4EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <yam7188.2198.129612752@clark.net>
On Monday, 01-Sep-97, Biostream@aol.com wrote [about Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)]:
quoted 9 lines Listen you CUNT!!!!! I was talking about a fucking computer with no add ons!>Listen you CUNT!!!!! I was talking about a fucking computer with no add ons! >Of course you can soup up your computer you fuck up, what the fuck do you >think RDJ works with! But if you're just gunna take your basic Home PC then >it's a whole other fucking story!!!!!!!! You flame me for all this stupid >shit but you don't realize that I was talking about how many add ons you'll >need to buy before you're computer will be up to professional abilities. Like >the fucking Zip Drive, Jazz Drive, Sample Cell, etc. Oh and another thing, if >you think your gunna try to use floppy disks to store your audio then you're >the most dipwanklyest Cunt around! Think before you FLAME!!!!! Shithead!!!!!
I'm gonna kick your fucking guts in!
quoted 2 lines SampleCell <<~~~~~ You've got to buy these things fuckboy, they just don't> SampleCell <<~~~~~ You've got to buy these things fuckboy, they just don't >grow on your ass one day.
yeah, it won't grow on yours because you spend too much time getting it rammed. fuckboy, yeah you fuck boys I guess :D
quoted 2 lines Just as fast, if not faster than any dedicated sampler. <~~~ you seem to> Just as fast, if not faster than any dedicated sampler. <~~~ you seem to >know jack shit about samplers
you seem to have some shit hanging from your arse
quoted 2 lines Yeah, shithead, and you had to BUY those things. In the> Yeah, shithead, and you had to BUY those things. In the >end you end up paying just as much as you would for a sampler.
yeah.. what's THE POINT? if a computer is better who gives a fuck? :D
quoted 2 lines SampleCell is just that. <~~~ of course you can just wait for it to grow on> SampleCell is just that. <~~~ of course you can just wait for it to grow on >your ass.
ok.. now I see.. the "<~~~" means there's some stupid crazy offensive remark after it, ok. :) next time be sure you don't leave a whole damn big quote with nothing else written on it :P -- heh I think with all the flames and stuff on IDM, this is actually something that gave me quite some enjoyment.. :D it was quite hilarious to read and respond to. __ __\ \ / /_\ \ \_____/ www.freq-div.home.ml.org
1997-09-01 18:02mythos@earthlink.netA very childish Biostream@aol.com wrote: >Listen you CUNT!!!!! Very intellectual response
From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 1 Sep 97 10:02:53 -0800
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <199709011702.KAA17748@norway.it.earthlink.net>
A very childish Biostream@aol.com wrote:
quoted 1 line Listen you CUNT!!!!!>Listen you CUNT!!!!!
Very intellectual response there Biostream.
quoted 1 line I was talking about a fucking computer with no add ons!>I was talking about a fucking computer with no add ons!
Didn't make yourself clear. Besides, the original question was asking about the setups used, and didn't narrow it down.
quoted 1 line what the fuck do you think RDJ works with!>what the fuck do you think RDJ works with!
I know what RDJ works with, as we discussed compatibility issues during a remix that he for us recently.
quoted 1 line Oh and another thing, if you think your gunna try to use floppy disks to>Oh and another thing, if you think your gunna try to use floppy disks to
store your audio then you're
quoted 1 line the most dipwanklyest Cunt around!>the most dipwanklyest Cunt around!
Store data not audio. You don't seem to be technically minded, seeing that your on AOL : )
quoted 1 line Think before you FLAME!!!!! Shithead!!!!!>Think before you FLAME!!!!! Shithead!!!!!
Wow ! A lot of thinking gone into your vocabulary on this one. Now go away little boy. : ) B.
1997-09-01 22:19wells>I know what RDJ works with, as we discussed compatibility issues during a >remix that he
From:
wells
To:
,
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 01 Sep 1997 18:19:17 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <3.0.3.32.19970901181917.00696664@titan.vcu.edu>
quoted 2 lines I know what RDJ works with, as we discussed compatibility issues during a>I know what RDJ works with, as we discussed compatibility issues during a >remix that he for us recently.
care to share? i'm interested in what rdj uses.. - wells oliver / s0ewoliv@titan.vcu.edu " when our worlds they fall apart when the walls come tumbling in though we may deserve it it will be worth it."
1997-09-02 03:57Oblique HostilityOn Mon, 1 Sep 1997, wells wrote: > >I know what RDJ works with, as we discussed compatibil
From:
Oblique Hostility
To:
wells
Cc:
, ,
Date:
Mon, 1 Sep 1997 22:57:19 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <Pine.LNX.3.93.970901225614.28291A-100000@soli.inav.net>
On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, wells wrote:
quoted 5 lines I know what RDJ works with, as we discussed compatibility issues during a> >I know what RDJ works with, as we discussed compatibility issues during a > >remix that he for us recently. > > care to share? i'm interested in what rdj uses.. >
What he says he's using these days is a Mac, Pro Tools, and some custom sequencing software. His latest records sound decidedly digital. --------------------------------------------------------------------- "Psyche manifests as psychic through something we call 'winding', because it twists, and puts things that were far apart next to each other, complicatedly, taffywise." -- winona on channel 78 Kent Williams kent@inav.net -- http://soli.inav.net/~kent
1997-09-02 02:14Nate Harrison [Digital Magician Inc]Soory to waste bandwidth, but now I'm curious- What's Pro Tools? I was under the impressio
From:
Nate Harrison [Digital Magician Inc]
To:
Oblique Hostility
Cc:
wells , , ,
Date:
Tue, 2 Sep 1997 02:14:56 +0000 ()
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <Pine.BSF.3.95.970902021323.27241A-100000@www.webelite.com>
Soory to waste bandwidth, but now I'm curious- What's Pro Tools? I was under the impression Cubase was the industry standard audio/sequencing software for the Mac/PC. Are they in the same category? Thanks Nate Nate Harrison Digital Magician Inc. www.digimagician.com nate@digimagician.com 313.994.7316
1997-09-02 20:08Random JunkNate Harrison \[Digital Magician Inc\] writes: > Soory to waste bandwidth, but now I'm cur
From:
Random Junk
To:
Nate Harrison \[Digital Magician Inc\]
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 2 Sep 1997 13:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <199709022008.NAA25342@hudsucker.gamespot.com>
Nate Harrison \[Digital Magician Inc\] writes:
quoted 5 lines Soory to waste bandwidth, but now I'm curious-> Soory to waste bandwidth, but now I'm curious- > > What's Pro Tools? I was under the impression Cubase was the industry > standard audio/sequencing software for the Mac/PC. Are they in the same > category?
there is no "industry standard" for sequencing. it's split between logic, performer, cubase and vision. anyway, cubase is a sequencer with audio capability. protools is an audio editing suite only. it's like a big ole multitrack tape deck only it uses soundfiles instead of tape. pretty keen. i edited my album "sweaty planet" (due out oct 28 in the uk) entirely with it. -- Jon Drukman jsd@gamespot.com SpotMedia Communications ...I was an infinitely hot and dense dot...
1997-09-03 13:39Robert R. StewartOn Tue, 2 Sep 97 11:47:20, vestige@earthlink.net wrote: >Seems like Mr. Biostream has got
From:
Robert R. Stewart
To:
Date:
Wed, 03 Sep 1997 09:39:22 EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <19970903.093444.9919.0.kenomira@juno.com>
On Tue, 2 Sep 97 11:47:20, vestige@earthlink.net wrote:
quoted 1 line Seems like Mr. Biostream has got a little hot under the collar, hasn't>Seems like Mr. Biostream has got a little hot under the collar, hasn't
he.
quoted 1 line I didn't think that the folks on AOL were allowed to use such>I didn't think that the folks on AOL were allowed to use such
language!!!
quoted 1 line Tsk Tsk.>Tsk Tsk.
They're not. If Mr. Biostream has offended any of you, send mail to TOS@aol.com (Terms Of Service), and report his abusive language. That'll get him kicked off AOL in a hurry, especially if they get multiple messages. Just a suggestion. RRS
1997-09-03 13:47soul whirling somewherei don't know or care what aphex/autechre use...but i'm happy with a studio 440 and protool
From:
soul whirling somewhere
To:
elitist nobs
Date:
Wed, 3 Sep 1997 08:47:22 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Aphex/Autechre/Gear (Response to Dipwank)
permalink · <Pine.BSI.3.95.970903084241.27027A-100000@enteract.com>
i don't know or care what aphex/autechre use...but i'm happy with a studio 440 and protools. of course with an arsenal of other equipment. peace... prymal ====== prymal@enteract.com www.enteract.com/~prymal an SAIE member A New January - digital electro dance music anj@enteract.com www.enteract.com/~anj