179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: (idm) Plaid? / NEW order

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) plaid? · (idm) plaid? / new order
1997-08-19 20:39James (idm) Plaid?
├─ 1997-08-19 21:07Brett McCormick Re: (idm) Plaid?
└─ 1997-08-19 21:13Re: (idm) Plaid? / NEW order
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-08-19 20:39James>(btw, i think Stuart's right about this one. but Clair says _Not For >Threes_ is >every b
From:
James
To:
Date:
19 Aug 97 13:39:33 -0700
Subject:
(idm) Plaid?
permalink · <199708192108.OAA01945@mailsun2.us.oracle.com>
quoted 3 lines (btw, i think Stuart's right about this one. but Clair says _Not For>(btw, i think Stuart's right about this one. but Clair says _Not For >Threes_ is >every bit worth the wait. so don't give up on Ed & Andy just yet.)
Is "Not for Threes" the name of the Plaid album? Have any idea what tracks are on it? This is simply the most eagerly awaited album of '97 for me. Almost as much as the new Sundays album. Next comes Bjork. Now only if New Order would get back together... James Jung-Hoon Seo // Oracle Tools Fundamental Technology Group (415) 506-3829 // 2op873 // jseo@us.oracle.com The technology of today is the cheese of tomorrow. // Anti:Rom
1997-08-19 21:07Brett McCormickYES!! YES!! I just heard them for the first time last week (substance) (yeah, yeah, i know
From:
Brett McCormick
To:
James
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 19 Aug 1997 14:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Plaid?
Reply to:
(idm) Plaid?
permalink · <199708192107.OAA00654@speedy.speakeasy.org>
YES!! YES!! I just heard them for the first time last week (substance) (yeah, yeah, i know).. they rock hands down, no question about it. And don't even try to have your own opinion.. ;) THEY ROCK. In any case, from what I've heard of plaid, I love them. What do they have that is available on CD? --brett On , 19 August 1997, at 13:39:33, James wrote:
quoted 1 line Now only if New Order would get back together...> Now only if New Order would get back together...
1997-08-19 21:13gg2g4ink@sprynet.comOn 19 Aug 97, "James" <JSEO@us.oracle.com> wrote: >Is "Not for Threes" the name of the Pla
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 19 Aug 1997 14:13:01 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) Plaid? / NEW order
Reply to:
(idm) Plaid?
permalink · <199708192113.OAA26851@m4.sprynet.com>
On 19 Aug 97, "James" <JSEO@us.oracle.com> wrote:
quoted 3 lines Is "Not for Threes" the name of the Plaid album? Have any idea what tracks are>Is "Not for Threes" the name of the Plaid album? Have any idea what tracks are >on it? This is simply the most eagerly awaited album of '97 for me. Almost as >much as the new Sundays album. Next comes Bjork.
yep - that is the name of Plaid's new album. no track listing yet. it'll probably be a while before advance copies are released from the holding bays at Warp Ctrl. WARP 54 ... scheduled for release on 10.13.97
quoted 1 line Now only if New Order would get back together...>Now only if New Order would get back together...
funny you should say that . . . your wish is granted! i won't get a chance to post a review of this until later on this evening, but: NEW ORDER - Video 5|8|6 (Touch/Tone 7) (c) 1997 one track - time = 22:25:13 more info soon. but if you get a chance to pick it up before then, SNATCH THIS DISC UP IMMEDIATELY! without a second thought! cheers! GuerillaG2-G4/ gg gg2g4ink@sprynet.com np: unplugged guitar; trying to figure out the chords for St. Christopher songs.