On Fri, 08 Aug 1997 15:11:18 +0000 0 <galaxey@earthlink.net> writes:
quoted 41 lines sc wrote:
>sc wrote:
>>
>> >I've been hearing talk about bisk lately .....what does it sound
>like ?
>>
>> god burping...
>>
>>
>> start with _time_, then get _strange or funny ha-ha?_ (both sub
>rosa). you
>> will soon forget about rephlex and squarepusher...
>
>Ahh I was hoping someone would say this. But since I have got sooo
>much heat
>lately, I needed to avoid some flames for a while. Rest assured, I am
>bound to
>piss some one off in the near future. BISK is the bomb mother fuckers.
>If someone
>could figure out how this person/persons program their shit I'd tell
>you to get a
>record deal today. I agree start with _time_ as it is more straight
>forward than
>_strange or funny ha-ha?_. I suck at reviews, so what I can say is
>that BISK
>reminds me a lot like Ae *ONLY* for the strangeness in
>programming/creating
>sounds. Ae suffers from constant looping, as we have discussed in the
>past. Bisk
>has the fucked up sounds, but manage to put it all together in a well
>thought out
>structure;) you don't need to worry about dn'b beats in either of
>their releases. If
>you like reversed reverbed sounds, _strange or funny ha ha?_ has a lot
>of this, at
>times too much. That is my only complaint about the two releases,
>other than
>that, they are both gems!!!
>
>see you,
>0
>