179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) hyperreal.org?

7 messages · 5 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) hyperreal.org? · (idm) hyperreal.org? global replace
1997-07-02 01:39john/bergmayer (idm) hyperreal.org?
├─ 1997-07-02 02:30The Rare Guy Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
│ └─ 1997-07-02 18:52Brett McCormick Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
└─ 1997-07-02 05:38Brett McCormick Re: (idm) hyperreal.org? global replace
1997-07-02 04:20GD (idm) hyperreal.org?
1997-07-02 09:16rw Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
└─ 1997-07-03 12:06Hillie Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-07-02 01:39john/bergmayernow at least 1/2 of my incoming idm messages are to idm@hyperreal.org instead of idm@hyper
From:
john/bergmayer
To:
Date:
Tue, 1 Jul 1997 18:39:05 -0700 (MST)
Subject:
(idm) hyperreal.org?
permalink · <Pine.BSI.3.95.970701183646.4151A-100000@usr01.primenet.com>
now at least 1/2 of my incoming idm messages are to idm@hyperreal.org instead of idm@hyperreal.org. i notice this because messages that have "idm@hyperreal.org" in their header are sorted to my IN.idm folder. it's always worked until today, when i open my personal inbox with 59 messages. any reason for the .org, or what?
1997-07-02 02:30The Rare GuyOn Wednesday, 02-Jul-97, john/bergmayer wrote [about (idm) hyperreal.org?]: >now at least
From:
The Rare Guy
To:
IDM
Date:
Wed, 02 Jul 1997 02:30:08 EST4EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
Reply to:
(idm) hyperreal.org?
permalink · <yam7122.428.128991640@clark.net>
On Wednesday, 02-Jul-97, john/bergmayer wrote [about (idm) hyperreal.org?]:
quoted 4 lines now at least 1/2 of my incoming idm messages are to idm@hyperreal.org>now at least 1/2 of my incoming idm messages are to idm@hyperreal.org >instead of idm@hyperreal.org. i notice this because messages that have >"idm@hyperreal.org" in their header are sorted to my IN.idm folder. it's >always worked until today, when i open my personal inbox with 59 messages.
heh.. me too :)
quoted 1 line any reason for the .org, or what?>any reason for the .org, or what?
probably because Hyperreal isn't a commercial business.. it's a non-profit organisation. and you need to prove you're a business (usually) in order that you can get a .com domain. __ __\ \ / /_\ \ \_____/ , m7=
1997-07-02 18:52Brett McCormickThe other way around pretty much -- If you want a .net or .org, it takes a little work, bu
From:
Brett McCormick
To:
Cc:
IDM
Date:
Wed, 2 Jul 1997 11:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
Reply to:
Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
permalink · <199707021852.LAA21644@speedy.speakeasy.org>
The other way around pretty much -- If you want a .net or .org, it takes a little work, but they send properly formatted .com requests through an automated registry program. On Wed, 2 July 1997, at 02:30:08, The Rare Guy wrote:
quoted 3 lines probably because Hyperreal isn't a commercial business.. it's a non-profit> probably because Hyperreal isn't a commercial business.. it's a non-profit > organisation. and you need to prove you're a business (usually) in order > that you can get a .com domain.
1997-07-02 05:38Brett McCormickwhat I'm wondering is why there is a global replace.. what about uuencoded files like this
From:
Brett McCormick
To:
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 1 Jul 1997 22:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) hyperreal.org? global replace
Reply to:
(idm) hyperreal.org?
permalink · <199707020538.WAA15139@speedy.speakeasy.org>
what I'm wondering is why there is a global replace.. what about uuencoded files like this one: the following should be hyperreal. com, not .org [uuencoded attachment: foo] The reason for .org is because they're nonprofit, though.. On Tue, 1 July 1997, at 18:39:05, john/bergmayer wrote:
quoted 7 lines now at least 1/2 of my incoming idm messages are to idm@hyperreal.org> now at least 1/2 of my incoming idm messages are to idm@hyperreal.org > instead of idm@hyperreal.org. i notice this because messages that have > "idm@hyperreal.org" in their header are sorted to my IN.idm folder. it's > always worked until today, when i open my personal inbox with 59 messages. > > any reason for the .org, or what? >
1997-07-02 04:20GDjohn/bergmayer wrote: > > now at least 1/2 of my incoming idm messages are to idm@hyperrea
From:
GD
To:
IDM List
Date:
Tue, 01 Jul 1997 23:20:21 -0500
Subject:
(idm) hyperreal.org?
permalink · <33B9D705.BE0E099F@worldnet.att.net>
john/bergmayer wrote:
quoted 7 lines now at least 1/2 of my incoming idm messages are to idm@hyperreal.org> > now at least 1/2 of my incoming idm messages are to idm@hyperreal.org > instead of idm@hyperreal.org. i notice this because messages that have > "idm@hyperreal.org" in their header are sorted to my IN.idm folder. it's > always worked until today, when i open my personal inbox with 59 messages. > > any reason for the .org, or what?
I've always wondered why the Hyperreal domain carried the .com designation. Now that it's switched to .org it makes a lot more sense. GD
1997-07-02 09:16rwOn Wed, 02 Jul 1997 02:30:08 EST4EDT, buh@clark.net wrote... >>any reason for the .org, or
From:
rw
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 2 Jul 1997 09:16:12
Subject:
Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
permalink · <199707021424.JAA08844@main.goldengate.net>
On Wed, 02 Jul 1997 02:30:08 EST4EDT, buh@clark.net wrote...
quoted 5 lines any reason for the .org, or what?>>any reason for the .org, or what? > >probably because Hyperreal isn't a commercial business.. it's a non-profit >organisation. and you need to prove you're a business (usually) in order >that you can get a .com domain.
Well, hyperreal was not asked to prove anything. We just decided on our own that the "org" extension better fit our mission and makeup. -- Rob Williams</>fEEd</>Tempest rw@goldengate.net</>tempest@hyperreal.org
1997-07-03 12:06HillieOn Wed, 2 Jul 1997, rw wrote: > Well, hyperreal was not asked to prove anything. We just d
From:
Hillie
To:
rw
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 3 Jul 1997 12:06:13 +0300 (EET DST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
Reply to:
Re: (idm) hyperreal.org?
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.96.970703120303.13802B-100000@explorer2.clark.net>
On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, rw wrote:
quoted 2 lines Well, hyperreal was not asked to prove anything. We just decided on our> Well, hyperreal was not asked to prove anything. We just decided on our > own that the "org" extension better fit our mission and makeup.
right.. When I co-founded our web-design co. (me & some m8's), we were asked to prove it.. the web company was based in Amsterdam, and we thought a COM domain would be better than an NL one, but we had to prove it was already a business or they would not let us use com :\