179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Dead Cities(NOISE)

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-04-05 17:06Re: (idm) Dead Cities(NOISE)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-04-05 17:06KaisrSolze@aol.com> Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't > really like it-
From:
To:
Date:
Sat, 5 Apr 1997 12:06:56 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities(NOISE)
permalink · <970405120655_-1034264834@emout15.mail.aol.com>
quoted 6 lines Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't> Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't > really like it- >> >> You don't really like it, ergo fsol = not idm ? >> (Let's not start this kind of discussion again, just take care of what you >> say everybody ;-)
What I meant was (and please let this be the last post on this aspect of the thread), and what I tried to explain further down the post-the hard techno tracks seem pretty damn repetitive and mindless to my ears, whereas the ambient ones are too formless to be dance music or even worthwhile listening (most may disagree). I'm not panning fsol in general as not idm, but this album doesn't seem to be, and I'm not interested on spending money on any other albums that sound like this, so I was asking other's opinions on Dead Cities and fsol in general. Ok, let this end here. Sam