179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) Re: Re: idm V1 #1010: state of IDM

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-03-11 12:00gmv500 (idm) Re: Re: idm V1 #1010: state of IDM
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-03-11 12:00gmv500our guy Seofon wrote: > Personally, I think IDM artists should bypass the industry entirel
From:
gmv500
To:
Date:
Tue, 11 Mar 1997 12:00:29 +0000
Subject:
(idm) Re: Re: idm V1 #1010: state of IDM
permalink · <3325495D.7490@earthlink.net>
our guy Seofon wrote:
quoted 2 lines Personally, I think IDM artists should bypass the industry entirely and> Personally, I think IDM artists should bypass the industry entirely and > network over the Interne
There you have it folks. It's pretty much the only way to keep it "underground" Or do it the way Namlook does (limited # of releases) which sorta sucks or do it DIY like Taylor Deupree did with the secret #12, available from him directly. I am sure there are tons of artists that have their own way of keeping it "underground" and we should all to our best to support it. Indie rock did it for the longest time until Nirvane showed up. Let's not travel that path again (or do the best to slow it down)