179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Re: idm V1 #973

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-02-12 17:54PhilE (idm) Re: idm V1 #973
1997-02-13 15:30Seofon (idm) Re: idm V1 #973
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-02-12 17:54PhilEtopher@france-techno.fr (Topher) wrote: > Are any of the following titles available on CD
From:
PhilE
To:
Date:
Wed, 12 Feb 1997 17:54:23 GMT
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm V1 #973
permalink · <31F112C1144@bagpuss.argonaut.com>
topher@france-techno.fr (Topher) wrote:
quoted 2 lines Are any of the following titles available on CD ?> Are any of the following titles available on CD ? > Thanks very much for your help. :-)
quoted 1 line I:CUBE: "Disco Cubizm (Daft Punk Remix)"> I:CUBE: "Disco Cubizm (Daft Punk Remix)"
Track 1 on 'I Love Techno', a various artists compilation on N.E.W.S. Phil ...I feel laaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAve...
1997-02-13 15:30Seofon>> Maybe the whole EP idea is stupid. Maybe EP's are all rip offs. ... >I, personally, wou
From:
Seofon
To:
Date:
Thu, 13 Feb 1997 08:30:15 -0700
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm V1 #973
permalink · <199702131624.IAA11880@shell.wco.com>
quoted 1 line Maybe the whole EP idea is stupid. Maybe EP's are all rip offs.>> Maybe the whole EP idea is stupid. Maybe EP's are all rip offs.
...
quoted 3 lines I, personally, would rather pay $10 for 30 min. of focused and inventive>I, personally, would rather pay $10 for 30 min. of focused and inventive >composition than $15 for 70 min. of attractive but aimless beats. Where is >this to be found? J
Interesting point. I usually have to go to my "experimental section" for the inventive composition, and then it's back to the "electronica section" when I'm wanting grooves, loops, etc. Techno certainly develops, but generally in a different way from more composition-based work, more based on sound structure, repetition, etc. To find the two together is indeed a challenge. Back when I was listening to Slowdive, Curve, et al., I always noted how I preferred the e.p.'s to the albums. More listenable -- cf. RDJ's short attention span, and would Autechre's _Garbage_ really hold up as a full-length album? Better quality -- one or two weak tracks ruin it. More cohesive -- I'll stand up for FSOL at this point, as I think they show up strongest on their e.p.'s, where they take a couple of musical themes and really work them for half an hour. Anyway, to tie back into the musical development issue ... I assume that we're talking about musicality and dynamics, not the brute allocation of ideas (i.e. Is "Out There Somwhere?" a 'better' song because it's lengthy and changes themes a few times? While we're at it, do you think of _Air_2_ as one piece or thirteen?) In their own ways, I think FSOL, Global Communication, and Paul Schutze (Uzect Plaush) do some great work in this regard. Of course, if you want the real shit, you should go back and check out Vangelis, Jean-Michel Jarre, Tangerine Dream, etc. -- and, to take a random example, you'll realize how much GloCom owes to Vangelis. I've also noticed that the 'Detroit school' of techno tends toward more musical development than the 'German school', so that might be an avenue to try if you haven't already. --Seofon