179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-01-29 18:27Alistair Stray (idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.
1997-01-31 00:49Re: (idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.
└─ 1997-01-31 03:41Hillie Re: (idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.
1997-01-31 04:07GD (idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-01-29 18:27Alistair StrayComputer animation, adobe effects, the 'wow principle'. God I really, really hate those so
From:
Alistair Stray
To:
Date:
Wed, 29 Jan 1997 18:27:40 GMT
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.
permalink · <199701291827.SAA06844@power1.powernet.co.uk>
Computer animation, adobe effects, the 'wow principle'. God I really, really hate those sort of videos. I'm a video artist who performs live, predominantly I mix with IDM or abstract ambient (by ambient I don't mean coffee table ambient like FSOL or the Orb. I mean things like lilith, behrens, cage, bryars, hausellworth, Aphex, RI etc.) I think a backlash against 'cosmic' videos has begun. The video for David Holmes 'my mate pete' and the Howie B videos being excellant examples. Cosmic is crap because it alienates the viewer. It is not as some ppl have posted an attempt to express the music, it's more often than not the 'Artists' attempt to express their equipment. Theres a lot of IDM like that as well. I mean, well yeah fair enough a technique can be an aesthetic statement in it's own right. However, when technique transcends the meaning rather than being subservient to it then crap pointless things eventually occur. The alienation effect should not be taken lightly. Eventually you will get sick of watching a 'cosmic' video because it doesn't involve you. Well, it does if your a sad techie anorak like myself who trainspots them like ,"ooh, a lightwave lens flare, look it's the viewpoint humanoid object again, grief that's a clever use of Real 3D's particle engine.' But as most ppl who r into the music haven't got a clue (and why the hell should they) how an effect is acheived you just bore them. Too many colours, too many morphs, too many multi-compositions. All it displays is the 'Artists' complete lack of artistic ability, reflecting only their equipment/software fetish. I think that balancing a video with it's music is the goal, to create a whole piece of art rather than two independant pieces (music and video) that just happen to be running concurrently. To involve the viewer by giving them something to relate to e.g use camera footage of real ppl in real places. Create narratives, try to build a proper mini cinematic experience. I make videos like that, and so are a lot of others. Eventually one of us may break through somewhere. I could witter on for hours about the convergence of video and audio, the importance of german expressionist cinema blah, blah. But I won't , I just posted to say that some of us are trying to make a point, some of us are trying to explore IDM through video without effects, animations and mad transitions. It's the balance between the 2 mediums I'm striving for. That's why I mix live with a DJ mixing a soundtrack live. We basically create improvisational films. The advantage of not physically attaching a sound permanently to a video sequence or loop allows us to do this. Anyway. I should be mixing at 'The Big Chill - Love in' at Brixton academy on the 14th of Feb if their are any UK'ers on the list who are interested. Plus I'm more than happy to knock out videos for IDM artists on the cheap, send us a tape. - Stray. http://users.powernet.co.uk/storm
1997-01-31 00:49Humanerr0r@aol.comIn a message dated 30/01/97 12:27:11, you write: > I think a backlash against 'cosmic' vid
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 30 Jan 1997 19:49:56 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.
permalink · <970130192314_304063773@emout12.mail.aol.com>
In a message dated 30/01/97 12:27:11, you write:
quoted 5 lines I think a backlash against 'cosmic' videos has begun. The video for David> I think a backlash against 'cosmic' videos has begun. The video for David > Holmes 'my mate pete' and the Howie B videos being excellant examples. > Cosmic is crap because it alienates the viewer. It is not as some ppl have > posted an attempt to express the music, it's more often than not the > 'Artists' attempt to express their equipment.
OK.. Now we all know that any dick with a raytracer can make some MTV rave fodder video, but what exactly are we attacking here? It is the artist's fault, not the tools used or the concepts people are trying to get across. Going 'live action' is just as futile an attempt to innovate as sticking with spinning hoops and spotted dolphins. I would say that it is a lot harder to make an innovative, quality piece of film to go with the music than it is to make the music itself. By innovative, I mean something that really dazzles. I don't get to see much experimental film work, but I could count on one hand the number of works that are really worthy of being used alongside <insert techno artist here>... With all due respect to whoever was involved, I thought the video projections on Aphex's tour were a waste of time for everyone involved, and just served to distract me from the real business going on. I thought the same of Warp's AI video. Don't be tempted to use second-rate visuals, it's probably better to use none at all.. I think Future Sound Of London have created the most interesting computer generated animations yet. Their Lifeforms video is worth buying for one short sequence alone - the sequence featuring floating castles, and a poly-tentacled jellyform, which I thought was stunning. Though they often get carried away and descend into a psychedelic mish-mash where it seems the idea is to have as many clashing hues and shades as there are pixels on the screen, which is more often than not tiring. At the moment, computer animation as far too maximalist.
quoted 3 lines The alienation effect should not be taken lightly. Eventually you will get> The alienation effect should not be taken lightly. Eventually you will get > sick of watching a 'cosmic' video because it doesn't involve you. Well, it > does if your a sad techie anorak like myself who trainspots them like
,"ooh,
quoted 1 line a lightwave lens flare, look it's the viewpoint humanoid object again,> a lightwave lens flare, look it's the viewpoint humanoid object again,
grief
quoted 1 line that's a clever use of Real 3D's particle engine.'> that's a clever use of Real 3D's particle engine.'
I hope I'm interpreting your idea of a 'cosmic' video correctly, but there's nothing wrong with the idea of 'cosmicness' in a film or animation - some (but not very much) IDM or techno music fits this idea perfectly (refer to the snippet concerning The Black Dog at the end of this post..) I just think it is far too difficult, and technically impossible at the moment to create animated visuals that really get an idea across, and don't look like a strung together collection of object paths, 500 polygon computer game baddies and unconvincing, unnatural body movements. But then again, what are we really trying to do here? Listening to (this) music is about exercising your imagination and understanding things in a very abstract way - it's a way of communicating with yourself, bypassing the ego (I'm sorry if this is hard to follow..). Couple music and film and everything is done for you, the abstract idea (which is of course originated wholly in the listener's head) suddenly takes on a very literal, external guise, and it is never as satisfying to do it this way - who wants to do that kind of thing in this day and age? I would say this - The Black Dog achieved far more, with small, simple computer generated pictures on the covers of Bytes and Applied Rhythmic Technology, than any film maker or animator will ever do. They created an atmosphere and a concept where their music, and sketchy, snatched visuals really did combine perfectly in a way I hadn't seen before or have seen since - a sign of genius that will endure. On Now? The Whirling Of Spirits - Balil
1997-01-31 03:41HillieOn 30-Jan-97, Humanerr0r@aol.com wrote: >I think Future Sound Of London have created the m
From:
Hillie
To:
IDM
Date:
Thu, 30 Jan 1997 22:41:11 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.
permalink · <yam6969.527.130323880@clark.net>
On 30-Jan-97, Humanerr0r@aol.com wrote:
quoted 8 lines I think Future Sound Of London have created the most interesting computer>I think Future Sound Of London have created the most interesting computer >generated animations yet. Their Lifeforms video is worth buying for one >short sequence alone - the sequence featuring floating castles, and a >poly-tentacled jellyform, which I thought was stunning. Though they often >get carried away and descend into a psychedelic mish-mash where it seems the >idea is to have as many clashing hues and shades as there are pixels on the >screen, which is more often than not tiring. At the moment, computer >animation as far too maximalist.
FSOL is the fucking king of raytraced graphics =) btw.. Where can one order IDM videos from, I guess it would be obvious if I lived in Europe, but I live in USA, and seems can't get them anywhere. There are some at this place in Italy (http://www.meloni.com/jlh/) but they don't have anything but metal/punk videos. -- Hillie aka Aurafix / PHD ja DAMONES hillien kotisivu - http://www.clark.net/pub/buh/index.html phase distortion - http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~airou/phd/ easy internet services - http://huizen.dds.nl/~eis Do re mi fa so la ti.. Oh let's see if I can make it easier...
1997-01-31 04:07GDAlistair Stray wrote: > I think that balancing a video with it's music is the goal, to cre
From:
GD
To:
IDM List
Date:
Thu, 30 Jan 1997 23:07:55 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm swirly videos and cosmic things in general.
permalink · <32F1701B.7198@worldnet.att.net>
Alistair Stray wrote:
quoted 5 lines I think that balancing a video with it's music is the goal, to create a> I think that balancing a video with it's music is the goal, to create a > whole piece of art rather than two independant pieces (music and video) that > just happen to be running concurrently. To involve the viewer by giving them > something to relate to e.g use camera footage of real ppl in real places. > Create narratives, try to build a proper mini cinematic experience.
I'm totally down with this - I think that the more abstract nature of IDM (given that it's almost entirely instrumental) allows for a more appropriate use of 'cinematic' images than most pop/rock music, which frequently is more about "the band" performing than anything else. Most electronica, having a more fluid structure, allows for a better alignment with a narrative of some sort than a video in which a skit of sorts occurs during the verses and the band rocks out on a soundstage or in concert during the chorus section. "The Box" is one of the few videos I've seen with this sort of thing, and I hope that this is the direction that videos will start to move in. GD