179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Re: illin' on illbient

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-01-23 19:56Elvia M. Tarango (idm) Re: illin' on illbient
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-01-23 19:56Elvia M. TarangoDram wrote: so i suppose this is a survey of sorts, but if you're one of those folx that g
From:
Elvia M. Tarango
To:
Date:
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 11:56:13 -0800
Subject:
(idm) Re: illin' on illbient
permalink · <v02130501af0c02f4a345@[136.152.117.99]>
Dram wrote: so i suppose this is a survey of sorts, but if you're one of those folx that gets annoyed by music classified and subclassified and genred to death, you might not want to read on.... i've been reading up on Paul Miller's self-describing inventaterm, illbient, and am wondering what you all on the list think of as a basic definition for it. When elaborated on, some seem to relate it mostly to dub, others say it's strictly a microgenre of trip-hop, still others say it is a more meditative and intellectually urbanized sibling of ambient. and of course there's more 'defs i'm leaving out....for me personally it's the most interesting subgenre/genre/kind 'o music to come up in a while, it seems that the people that make it each have some sort of individual theory or manifesto behind the hows and whys of its creation, and i'm a sucker for that kinda stuff. i suppose you could say the stuff i spin/make fits under the term's widest umbrella, so there's another root of the curiosity.... welp. enough babblin'. responses will be appreciated. Fred writes: I would say that it is all of the above mentioned aspects of the musics and that is the strong point of illbient. It can morph into whatever it wants while keeping the boundry of ambience. Fred