179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Re: Re: for sale/trade

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (amb) re: (idm) re: re: for sale/trade · (idm) re: re: for sale/trade
1996-11-17 08:22Thad Biggerstaff (idm) Re: Re: for sale/trade
└─ 1996-11-17 21:0921st Century Soul Re: (idm) Re: Re: for sale/trade
└─ 1996-11-17 22:38Julius anthony Martinez (amb) Re: (idm) Re: Re: for sale/trade
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-11-17 08:22Thad Biggerstaff> On Sat, 16 Nov 1996, Thad Biggerstaff wrote: > > First off, thanks for all those who sup
From:
Thad Biggerstaff
To:
Cc:
Date:
Sun, 17 Nov 1996 02:22:29 -0600
Subject:
(idm) Re: Re: for sale/trade
permalink · <9611170822.AA18090@coop.crn.org>
quoted 11 lines On Sat, 16 Nov 1996, Thad Biggerstaff wrote:> On Sat, 16 Nov 1996, Thad Biggerstaff wrote: > > First off, thanks for all those who supported my sale/trade lists > > the past two or so weeks. It is quite apparent that there are > > more people who would rather have such lists posted than not. > > Nope. The consensus of the messages I got was that folks do not want a > separate for-sale mailing list, they're fine with for-sale notices on idm > and ambient, but that they strongly agree with the rule on the ambient > list, which is limit it to one screenful, and point to a web page or > USENET posting. >
This was my intention, though i guess i went over a screen full. wont happen again...
quoted 6 lines I do not have web axcess at this point, so i will continue to> > I do not have web axcess at this point, so i will continue to > > post lists once every week or two. > > Check out pobox.com or hotmail.com or even best.com. Surely you can > afford ~$10-20 per month? There are even places to do it for free, but > I'm not going to research your options for you.
i didnt ask you to. I have recieved my internet access through work at no cost, and appreciate it, thank you.
quoted 4 lines Hmm, do the folks at crn.org know you're using their resources to conduct> > Hmm, do the folks at crn.org know you're using their resources to conduct > commerce? Looking at the mission statement at www.crn.org, it looks like > the purpose of that organization is anything but commerce.
I have recieved internet access through being a part of their pilot program (Together.Net), a project to get local community non-profit organizations connected to one another via the internet. thanks for being suspicious, though...
quoted 6 lines I'm not trying to be nit picky or to single you out, honest. There is> I'm not trying to be nit picky or to single you out, honest. There is > a line which you are crossing, one created both by the community here and > the folks who make hyperreal possible, and just about everyone else knows > how to work within them and respect those constraints. No one has any > problem with the fact that you sell discs (even commercially) and you want > to make folks on /relevant/ mailing lists aware of what you have.
I had thought that this was the precise problem the original poster had an issue with, me posting such lists. I was meaning to address it.
quoted 4 lines Folks on the ambient and idm lists might not know this, but Thad also> Folks on the ambient and idm lists might not know this, but Thad also > posted his for-sale list to all the rave mailing lists on hyperreal, and > elsewhere. Fortunately the anti-spam filters on hyperreal prevented it > from getting through to those lists.
I did this merely by using another's header as my source for addresses for my list. This person had originally requested from all the lists a source of music to buy/trade from. I responded to this request hitting the reply button, and did not think it would be a problem to send such a posting to the other lists. it seems i was wrong- from now on i will only post to those lists im subscribed to (though this all makes me curious about the original poster asking for sources of music...) -Thad
1996-11-17 21:0921st Century Soul> > Nope. The consensus of the messages I got was that folks do not want a > > separate fo
From:
21st Century Soul
To:
Thad Biggerstaff
Cc:
, ,
Date:
Sun, 17 Nov 1996 16:09:50 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: Re: for sale/trade
Reply to:
(idm) Re: Re: for sale/trade
permalink · <Pine.3.89.9611171659.D16822-0100000@fn3.freenet.tlh.fl.us>
quoted 9 lines Nope. The consensus of the messages I got was that folks do not want a> > Nope. The consensus of the messages I got was that folks do not want a > > separate for-sale mailing list, they're fine with for-sale notices on idm > > and ambient, but that they strongly agree with the rule on the ambient > > list, which is limit it to one screenful, and point to a web page or > > USENET posting. > > > > This was my intention, though i guess i went over a screen full. > wont happen again...
try *6* screens full. some of us don't have nice massive monitors. mb
1996-11-17 22:38Julius anthony MartinezOn Sun, 17 Nov 1996, 21st Century Soul wrote: > > This was my intention, though i guess i
From:
Julius anthony Martinez
To:
21st Century Soul
Cc:
Thad Biggerstaff , ,
Date:
Sun, 17 Nov 1996 14:38:29 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
(amb) Re: (idm) Re: Re: for sale/trade
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Re: Re: for sale/trade
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.95.961117143710.12159A-100000@mail.sdsu.edu>
On Sun, 17 Nov 1996, 21st Century Soul wrote:
quoted 5 lines This was my intention, though i guess i went over a screen full.> > This was my intention, though i guess i went over a screen full. > > wont happen again... > > try *6* screens full. some of us don't have nice massive monitors. >
Well doesn't it depend on the size of your font and how large your monitor is? T.