179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Fwd: (313) illegal

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-08-05 17:01(idm) Fwd: (313) illegal
1996-08-05 17:36Aran M. Parillo Re: (idm) Fwd: (313) illegal
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-08-05 17:01O4thWorld@aol.com<< Subj: Re: (313) illegal Date: 05/08/96 14:56:24 From: O4th World To: DJESRANI@center.co
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 5 Aug 1996 13:01:08 -0400
Subject:
(idm) Fwd: (313) illegal
permalink · <960805124348_592708569@emout13.mail.aol.com>
<< Subj: Re: (313) illegal Date: 05/08/96 14:56:24 From: O4th World To: DJESRANI@center.colgate.edu In a message dated 05/08/96 14:22:17, you write:
quoted 1 line Subj: (313) illegal>Subj: (313) illegal
quoted 8 lines i picked up this white label the other day -- no print, with the exception> i picked up this white label the other day -- no print, with the exception > of the words "illegal" in bold type, with "detroit" in fine print >underneath. > > anyone know this record? it's very smooth after-hours house, almost in > the vein of like.. black science orchestra or the new nu yorican soul > record. >
Was this the Kenny Larkin/Stacey Pullen remixes of Sade? Not sure what story was behind this release , had 3 mixes , one long mix on A and 2 on flip. I am not too familiar with Sade's material , but from what I can remember the line "Surrender your Love" was oft repeated. It was charted by many Dj's as "Larkin/Pullen Project" ,this was definatly a bootleg because the sound quality was poor, but does this have similar story to recent Carl Craig/Larkin remixes of Chalk Farm? s.m@4th world records uk http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/4thworld >> --------------------- Forwarded message: Subj: Re: (313) illegal Date: 96-08-05 10:56:24 EDT From: O4th World To: DJESRANI@center.colgate.edu In a message dated 05/08/96 14:22:17, you write:
quoted 1 line Subj: (313) illegal>Subj: (313) illegal
quoted 8 lines i picked up this white label the other day -- no print, with the exception> i picked up this white label the other day -- no print, with the exception > of the words "illegal" in bold type, with "detroit" in fine print >underneath. > > anyone know this record? it's very smooth after-hours house, almost in > the vein of like.. black science orchestra or the new nu yorican soul > record. >
Was this the Kenny Larkin/Stacey Pullen remixes of Sade? Not sure what story was behind this release , had 3 mixes , one long mix on A and 2 on flip. I am not too familiar with Sade's material , but from what I can remember the line "Surrender your Love" was oft repeated. It was charted by many Dj's as "Larkin/Pullen Project" ,this was definatly a bootleg because the sound quality was poor, but does this have similar story to recent Carl Craig/Larkin remixes of Chalk Farm? s.m@4th world records uk http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/4thworld
1996-08-05 17:36Aran M. ParilloAt 01:01 PM 8/5/96 -0400, O4thWorld@aol.com wrote: >It was charted by many Dj's as "Larkin
From:
Aran M. Parillo
To:
,
Date:
Mon, 05 Aug 1996 13:36:32 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) Fwd: (313) illegal
permalink · <9608051735.AA05784@MIT.MIT.EDU>
At 01:01 PM 8/5/96 -0400, O4thWorld@aol.com wrote:
quoted 3 lines It was charted by many Dj's as "Larkin/Pullen Project" ,this was definatly>It was charted by many Dj's as "Larkin/Pullen Project" ,this was definatly >a bootleg because the sound quality was poor, but does this have similar >story to recent Carl Craig/Larkin remixes of Chalk Farm?
No. The Charm Farm (note spell check) remixes are legit. They came out first in white (PRO-554) for the sake of showing Mercury what we've known all along, which is that Detroits finest can take a pop chewn and turn it inside out and make it boom boom pomi-ami. Teep PS: How about that Direct Beat Website! YOW! http://www.submerge.com/directbeat/